Jump to content

Ur-Leica Story


terry_sham

Recommended Posts

x

Well, according to Erwin Puts' Leica Lens Compendium, the lens on the Ur-Leica was a 42mm f/4.5 Leitz Mikro-Summar of 6 elements (out of Leitz's microscope lens catalogue of 1910).

 

So neither a Zeiss, nor a Tessar (6 elements vs. 4) nor a 50mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

James Lager's "Leica: An Illustrated History, Vol. 1" (1993 edn.) says about the Ur-Leica, pp8

 

"Two cameras were prepared; only the unit illustrated survives. Various lenses were tried on the Ur-Leica; at first a 5cm f/3.5 Zeiss Kino-Tessar, then a 6.4cm f/4.5 Leitz Microsummar and finally a Leitz 42mm Milar presently fitted. The second camera was carried by Ernst Leitz II on his trip to the United States in 1914"

 

FWIW, a refined Ur-Leica was constructed c1918-20, and is referred to as prototype #3. There is also a picture in Lager of this camera, but without a lens fitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from LLC by EP:

"He chose the Mikro-Summar 1:4.5/42mm, which he fitted in at least one of his three prototypes. The Ur-Leica, residing in the museum in Solms, has been equipped with this lens. Some researchers have identified the lens as a Milar or a Summar. There is no inscription on the lens, so there is room for some interpretation. The exact focal length however can be measured and recently the optical engineers at Solms just did this and established a focal length of 42mm. The only lens in the Leitz microscope catalogue around 1910 is the Mikro-Summar, a six element symmetrical lens. So we may now reveal with certainty the identity of the mysterious lens in the Ur-Leica. It is a Mikro-Summar with 6 elements, symmetrically arranged."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...