MattLain Posted March 29, 2009 Share #1 Posted March 29, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) At the moment I'm using an Epson 4490 for 35mm + 120 scans at home. And a Flextight 343 on occasion. The difference in quality is enormously towards the Imacon for 120 but not so much for 35mm. My question is: Will a Microtek scanner dedicated to 35mm give significant enough results to replace the use of my Epson flatbed? Or is the step from Epson-Microtek miniscule enough that I should just make the leap to a Nikon-V/5000 or Imacon-Hasselblads all together? Any thoughts or opinions greatly appreciated! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 29, 2009 Posted March 29, 2009 Hi MattLain, Take a look here Microtek.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
ai1 Posted March 31, 2009 Share #2 Posted March 31, 2009 I have both a Nikon ED5000 and a Microtek M-1. I use the Microtek only for 4x5, for which it is adequate for prints up to 16x20, and contact sheets for 35mm. I would not rely on the Microtek for 35mm at all. It is very slow and not a match overall to the Nikon scanner. Use the Imacon or get the Nikon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.