herrfox Posted February 24, 2009 Share #1 Posted February 24, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) hi..i think that jpg is better!!!for me it's hard to get a good jpg from raw+capture one ,in some conditions(little dark images)above all.What you think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Hi herrfox, Take a look here d-lux 4_jpg vs raw. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
herrfox Posted February 27, 2009 Author Share #2 Posted February 27, 2009 better explanation: for me,it is hard to adjust properly a little underexposed image rwl and to get a good jpg.I not succeed in doing a good work and i not succeed in getting a jpg with leica colors..and leica exposition,so..i think that a jpg properly exposed is better of a rwl!!(i tryed with capture and with lightroom and however it is possible that lightroom is better!)what you think about?is a real d-lux 4 problem?i'd like to correct the rwl files and to get jpg with detaiils,contrast,color,the same detalis,contrast and colors of the d-lux 4 files.jpg.Can someone help me? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.