ckthual Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share #21 Posted October 25, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Ray, I have a few FTP servers, you can try to send your files at this adress : c.thual@thual-agathon.fr it should accept large files, but if you could zip the file before you send it, it would increase it a bit. Regards PS/ too bad yousendit doesn't work for you... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Hi ckthual, Take a look here D-Lux3 "Performance Proof" ???. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
ckthual Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share #22 Posted October 25, 2006 Ray, After I checked, I'm not too sure if my e-mail adress can take files larger than 10Mo... :-( BUT I've found another site you can send files from, I hope it will work for you (i just tried it OK) : demo.ovh.com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickR Posted October 25, 2006 Share #23 Posted October 25, 2006 I just uploaded a raw file there. Hope this link works: demo.ovh.com (PS I don't know why but when I uploaded demo.ovh.com added the .tiff extension to the file. It's not a tiff but raw straight from the camera) Ray, After I checked, I'm not too sure if my e-mail adress can take files larger than 10Mo... :-(BUT I've found another site you can send files from, I hope it will work for you (i just tried it OK) : demo.ovh.com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted October 25, 2006 Share #24 Posted October 25, 2006 The Dlux2 certainly delivers. If you wish for a reference speak to vic vic about that issue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckthual Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share #25 Posted October 25, 2006 Thanks NickR, I've downloaded yor file successfully - lost the useless tiff extension - and uploaded it here : http://ckthual.free.fr/transfert/dlux3_raw_files/ If someone else wants to share a raw file for else's attentive study ( ;-) ), I would put their files at the same place... Regards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dNorm Posted October 25, 2006 Share #26 Posted October 25, 2006 I agree, those proofs are not very flattering. Here is a sample that I took straight from the camera at full resolution with both Sharpening and NR set to Low. -Norm http://users.adelphia.net/~nboyer/images/L1000250.JPG Hi,I wonder if this has been discussed here already, if it's the case, please forgive this pointless thread. I've been looking for a compact P&S camera I could always have in my bag with me, and after all the bad things I've heard so far, I was still waiting to see files coming from the D-Lux 3 (yes, I know about the Panasonic, I wanted to see pictures from the Leica branded final product) before I take a decision (which is hard to take : the Ricoh GR-D is so full of noise too, there's no date announced for the new SIGMA DP1, I would love a 28 or 35mm "35mm equi" lens - now if it really isn't possible, give me a zoom with it... ;o( ). Tonight I came across what Leica calls on their website D-Lux 3 Performance Proof which can be seen here : Leica Camera AG - Downloads Now, I need your opinion... IT CAN'T BE THAT BAD ????? My last hope comes from the jpeg destruction type on the top Leica logo, as some text and logo was added, maybe the file wasn't saved properly... but if the image really came that way?? I don't understand how Leica can call this a Performance Proof ? It is so terrible it should be called a Performance SPOOF... Opinions, anyone ? Cedric www.thual.net Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.