sfage Posted September 26, 2006 Share #1 Posted September 26, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hello everyone. I have a question about images that combine black and white and colour. I am trying to create a triptych of poplar trees in autumn. I have already shot the trees and am working on making the surrounding sky B+W. I am using the magic wand tool in photoshop. I am selecting all areas of the sky to remove the saturation but it takes ages because there are literally hundreds of little spots within the tree where the blue sky pokes its way through. Of course, I have to go in to every single little spot, select and desaturate it. Once that's done, the image is "reasonable" but I lose a lot of sharpness around the tree's detail. Is there an easier way to do this? Is there a "better" way to do this? Is this a "layering" issue? two examples (of three): Gray Poplar Diptych 2 | terminus1525.ca Gray Poplar Diptych 1 | terminus1525.ca Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 26, 2006 Posted September 26, 2006 Hi sfage, Take a look here B+W and colour. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
simon_hughes Posted September 26, 2006 Share #2 Posted September 26, 2006 Shane, Try selecting by color. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfage Posted September 26, 2006 Author Share #3 Posted September 26, 2006 Thanks for your speedy reply Simon. I just figured it out. Cheers! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon_hughes Posted September 26, 2006 Share #4 Posted September 26, 2006 Have you tried looking at the individual channels to see if one might be better for creating a mask? Ciao, Simon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfage Posted September 26, 2006 Author Share #5 Posted September 26, 2006 Hmm. Nope! I will try that. This particular fix has solved my problem, though. I'm sorry if my question(s) seem a little rudimentary but this is a first for me. Generally, I don't create "digital art" per sé. I capture images as they are and frame them with the eye. I don't completely change colours within an image... generally. I will repost the repaired images. This is MUCH better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfage Posted September 26, 2006 Author Share #6 Posted September 26, 2006 Okay... I have replaced the file. I "did" learn one new thing. In a situation like this (dense, complex images) it is better to USM first, then pull the background sky colour out. It prints as sharp as can be. It works beautifully. Gray Poplar Diptych 2 | terminus1525.ca Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon_hughes Posted September 26, 2006 Share #7 Posted September 26, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Looks very nice, Shane. Cheers, Simon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_l Posted September 26, 2006 Share #8 Posted September 26, 2006 What I do for this is to convert to b&w, then select the last color step as source for the history brush, then paint in the objects I want to be in color with the brush.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
odklizec Posted September 26, 2006 Share #9 Posted September 26, 2006 For quick desaturation of some parts of images, I'm using Photobrush by Mediachance (not only because I work for them ). There is a tool called "Color Equalizer" allowing the rapid saturation/desaturation of the selected hue by moving few sliders. It works very nice with photos with well separated colors. For example, this was achieved by simple moving all non-red sliders down and then desaturating some remaining reddish areas outside the tomatoes using the B&W retouch brush. And finally, I did some Brightness/Contrast adjustments. All done in less than 5 min. The original image as taken by "shrunk" (a DPReview forum member). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.