albertwang Posted September 6, 2006 Share #1 Posted September 6, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I presume anyone here will plan to get the Panasonic L1? I am beginning to really like it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 6, 2006 Posted September 6, 2006 Hi albertwang, Take a look here Anyone here plans to get the Panasonic L1?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
etanguero Posted September 6, 2006 Share #2 Posted September 6, 2006 I'd prefer a LC2 - same 4/3 lenses but no mirror! eT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
patina Posted September 8, 2006 Share #3 Posted September 8, 2006 ...as soon as I get one in my hands to check how it actually feels. Nice complement to my analog R-gear and I hope to be able to use my longer R-lenses with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smep Posted September 8, 2006 Share #4 Posted September 8, 2006 Nein. (No) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptomsu Posted September 8, 2006 Share #5 Posted September 8, 2006 Never !!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted September 8, 2006 Author Share #6 Posted September 8, 2006 ...as soon as I get one in my hands to check how it actually feels. Nice complement to my analog R-gear and I hope to be able to use my longer R-lenses with it. Sounds good. There is a cameraquest adapter that allows you to use R lenses on the 4/3 body. Go to cameraquest.com and you can order from them. I currently have one and using it on my Olympus E300. Very lovely outfit. Here is an example of my OLIA (Olympus+ Leica) using the 24mm Elmarit-R lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest umb Posted September 8, 2006 Share #7 Posted September 8, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I presume anyone here will plan to get the Panasonic L1? I am beginning to really like it. what for? 4/3 sucks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted September 8, 2006 Author Share #8 Posted September 8, 2006 what for? 4/3 sucks. Have you tested it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest umb Posted September 8, 2006 Share #9 Posted September 8, 2006 Have you tested it? No, but I know from my APS-C (4/3 should be even worse) DSLR that in many situations you get too much depth of field with anything less than 24*36mm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted September 8, 2006 Author Share #10 Posted September 8, 2006 I don't agree. The depth of field is the same regardless of sensor size. In fact, the Summilux-R 50mm f1.4 will give the same depth of field at f1.4 using a chip size of 35mm or 4/3 or APS size. Remember, the sensor size changes nothing about the properties of the lens. It only crops, not transforms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest umb Posted September 8, 2006 Share #11 Posted September 8, 2006 I don't agree. The depth of field is the same regardless of sensor size. In fact, the Summilux-R 50mm f1.4 will give the same depth of field at f1.4 using a chip size of 35mm or 4/3 or APS size. Remember, the sensor size changes nothing about the properties of the lens. It only crops, not transforms. yes but if you want the same picture you get with a 50mm summi in 4/3 you have to choose a 25mm lens. so in 4/3 with a standard focal length you get the DOF of a 25mm lens, which is what i dont want. look at all the digital pictures with infinite DOF and you know what I'm talking about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted September 8, 2006 Author Share #12 Posted September 8, 2006 I believe that will be the angle of view you would be referring to. Yes, I go agree. However, I have taken a different approach. For a 24mm lens, I step back from the subject to incorporate more of the view if needs be rather than switch to the more wide angle lens. If I were to use say a 18mm lens instead, that would give me the "look" of a 18mm lens but not a 24m lens (more distortion, etc.) Of course, that's why Leica has digital specific lenses soon. It is supposed to correct for both view of angle and depth of field. Hopefully that 25mm f1.4 will give the fingerprint of the Summilux-R 50mm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.