Q3 handling vs Q2?

[msimanyi]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I am not currently a Leica owner, but I am strongly considering a few products (Q3 43, M11, possibly the Q3M or M11M.) 

One that seems like almost a sure-thing is the Q3 43.  I can get my hands on this in a camera store nearby - including the Leica store in Los Angeles - but I can't find anyone locally who has a loaner or rental where I could apply the rental charges to a purchase if I like it.

But I do have a friend with a Q2, and he's offered to lend it to me.  

Can anyone who has used both the Q2 and Q3 comment on similarities between the two, in the sense of how they handle?

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[LocalHero1953]

More or less identically, with the exception of the Q3 flip screen, and the transfer of of buttons from left to right. After a few weeks I didn’t notice the difference. 

Edit: I had the Q2, and exchanged it for a Q3 43.  

Edited 17 minutes ago by LocalHero1953

[Aram Langhans]

I used the Q2 for a few years then got a Q3 that I have had a year.  My Q3 is the 28mm version, so  not sure how valid my observations will be.

As far as just handling, I did not notice much difference at all when I went to the Q3.  Yes, it has the tilt screen, but if you are not using it, to my feel there was no difference at all.  Some have objected to the aesthetics to which I say, who cares....  That said, while the tilt screen was not why I traded up, I have found it useful from time to time for low angle shots with my old knees.  How you feel about the aesthetics is a personal choice, but from a strictly handling perspective, with my shooting style the extra thickness did not affect my shooting at all.  It took me a while to get use to the new button positions on the Q3.  Now that I have used it, I think the location of the function buttons above the screen still bothers me a bit.  Probably because the way I have my camera set up with the profiles I have made, I rarely ever use the buttons to change anything but old habits die hard.  And as a new user you would not have any habits to break, so I guess that would be a non-issue for you. 

Since you strictly asked about handling, I will not comment on feature difference.  From my experience you will not notice a difference in handling between the two as a new user.  Now, of course, the lens is a different story, and you will have to pick the focal length that is right for you.  If you like some wide shots like I do, then the 28 over the 43 would be the way to go.  If you seldom go into the wide territory, then the 42 would be for you.  The only other thing I can think of is when the new firmware comes out for the Q3 series to match the Q3 Monochrom, that will make the handling of the Q3 very different from the Q2.  I am having worries about that for me as change comes hard for me sometime.  Haven't heard if they will also change the Q2 firmware.  

Hope this helps.

[LocalHero1953]

In response to @Aram Langhans post…..

I have the SL3-S which has the same interface the Q3M appears to have, and which the Q3 and Q3 43 are likely to get. Aside from getting used to different icons on the quick menu screen, the difference is in greater customisation of the quick menu, which is an improvement (IMO). 

Edited 12 minutes ago by LocalHero1953

[Pelu2010]

Hi,

I owned the q2  and switched to q3.

there was one thing that bothered me with the q2: You can’t charge the camera while you travel. If you like to shoot a lot and shoot more than 200 images a day , then you need more batteries for the q2. And if you plan to film even more. 
that is much relaxed with the q3. The consumption is the same but you can use a powerbank. 
 

If you invest that much money in a camera I would only buy it if I can test it. So maybe there is a dealer that ships the camera to you with this conditions. 
what about keh? 
https://www.keh.com/shop/search/?q=Leica+q3

Talk to them and I am sure you can they let you test the camera. 
 

and they seem to have a good service. 
 

cheers peter