Olaf_ZG Posted 2 hours ago Share #1 Posted 2 hours ago Advertisement (gone after registration) I have had the Q, the Q2 and the Q43. I didn’t like the performance of the Q2 with lack of light. To me, the Q3 performed much better in that aspect. Low light performance of the Q2M is somewhere near the m10m. How much better will be the Q3M in low light? Will there be a noticeable difference when photographing in, for example, a dim light bar/cafe? Is the difference comparable with the difference between m10m and m11m? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Hi Olaf_ZG, Take a look here Q2M vs Q3M …. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Mr Perceptive Posted 1 hour ago Share #2 Posted 1 hour ago Dynamic Range v ISO Q2M is roughly one stop better than the Q2 Q3 is roughly the same as Q2M (advantages of a BSI sensor) I'd expect the Q3M to be in the order of 1 stop better than the Q3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olaf_ZG Posted 1 hour ago Author Share #3 Posted 1 hour ago One stop better, but does it need to be offset with a higher shutterspeed due to movement visible due to higher mp? will the image show nicer noise, feel more film like? What will be the significance difference image wise between the 2 and 3? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now