Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello all, I've just posted the second part of my "A Return to the Q" post. In my previous post, I discussed what drew me back to the Leica Q line and how it compares to the M and SL systems. This time, I dive into which Q model | chose, why it fits my kit, and compare each model of the Q lineup. If you are torn between the models I hope that this will help!

Part 2: A Return to the Q

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, anonymoose said:

Thanks for the writeup. I went Q2 Reporter --> Q3 --> Q2 Reporter and am overall quite happy with the decision. There are times when I wish I could crop a tiny bit more or that AF was a little better, but not enough to give up my Q2 Reporter :)

Just curious why you prefer the Q2 to the Q3?

Is it just the colour and trim or something else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 13 Minuten schrieb JNK100:

Just curious why you prefer the Q2 to the Q3?

Yes, that would interest me too.

vor 21 Stunden schrieb anonymoose:

There are times when I wish I could crop a tiny bit more

Why do you wish that?
47.3 MP gives a lot of room for heavy crops, except you need to blow-up the cropped part for big size prints.
But yes, the 60,3MP of the Q3 gives more room for heavy cropping.

A great article you wrote!

Chris

Edited by PhotoCruiser
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...