mottykytu Posted May 1 Share #1 Posted May 1 Advertisement (gone after registration) After asking here, I want to buy an M240 for usability the problems is I don't know if M240 - M240P have Any major flaws (Like the CCD problems on M9 or the Ring on M10 ) What do I need to focus when testing the old , pre-owned M240/MP240 ? And for 600 usd it is worth upgrade M240 to MP240? many thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 1 Posted May 1 Hi mottykytu, Take a look here What to test when buying an old M240 - MP240 ?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Chris W Posted May 1 Share #2 Posted May 1 I don't think there is anything specific. I guess shutter count? Other than that, a scuffed worn camera will have been used a lot, whereas a clean looking camera has probably been well looked after. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted May 1 Share #3 Posted May 1 Mine is scuffed but well looked after. My dealer describes M240s (and their family members) as "bullet proof". 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mottykytu Posted May 1 Author Share #4 Posted May 1 16 minutes ago, andybarton said: Mine is scuffed but well looked after. My dealer describes M240s (and their family members) as "bullet proof". I have heard they have "White Balance issues" which make the final photo more yellow in Jpeg ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted May 1 Share #5 Posted May 1 I never use jpg, so can’t comment on that. Some colours can seem a bit saturated (red and greens), but that’s easily adjusted in post-processing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted May 1 Share #6 Posted May 1 (edited) All cameras have slightly different colours, and tastes vary. I would describe the M240 colours as both warmer and more realistic than the M9. But until recently Leica's colours and how they were interpreted by raw developers were never entirely happy in their first year. In that time I usually made my own custom dual illuminant colour profile, Typically by the end of the first year Adobe and/or Leica had sorted out the profiles ('Adobe Standard') to my satisfaction. I haven't had to do that with the SL2-S or Q3-43 (I bought both at launch): I liked the colours from the start. At one time, you could check the shutter count in the menu of a M body, but I can't remember if they stopped allowing that in the M240 or M10. I would agree with Andy's dealer's comment about 'bullet-proof'. Edited May 1 by LocalHero1953 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
costa43 Posted May 1 Share #7 Posted May 1 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) If it turns on and takes pictures then I would just ensure the rangefinder is calibrated well and the dials/buttons work and then go shoot. Only you can decide whether the 600 is worth the upgrade. For me, I probably wouldn't bother and pick up a nice Voigtlander lens instead. Edited May 1 by costa43 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted May 1 Share #8 Posted May 1 40 minutes ago, LocalHero1953 said: they stopped allowing that in the M240 Correct 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted May 1 Share #9 Posted May 1 As far as I remember the difficulty with knowing the number of shutter-actuations with the M240 series was due to the fact that these cameras had Live View and Video capabilities; both of which actuated the shutter but in the case of Live View an image had not been recorded. It is therefore impossible to determine shutter actuations through the standard file-numbering route even assuming that the file numbering had not at any time been 'zeroed'. Philip. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
84bravo Posted May 2 Share #10 Posted May 2 The MP-240 has a larger buffer, which makes it worth the $600 premium IMO. I shoot only DNG and the buffer fills fast on the standard M240. Plus I'm a sucker for the Leica script on top. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve edmunds Posted May 6 Share #11 Posted May 6 check that you can get a spare battery Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mottykytu Posted May 7 Author Share #12 Posted May 7 18 hours ago, steve edmunds said: check that you can get a spare battery Why? you can add one anytime ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham (G4FUJ) Posted May 7 Share #13 Posted May 7 1 hour ago, mottykytu said: Why? you can add one anytime ? From other posts here it would seem they are difficult to find now... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos cruz Posted May 7 Share #14 Posted May 7 I wouldn’t pay much attention to paintwork it’s supposed to wear off, two batteries (and nitecore usb charger) got me through a month with very limited power sources. Generally it’s really built like a tank, never encountered any freezing or need for some hard resets. I rarely used it past 1600 isp. Sensor wipes could be useful I have a feeling it gathered dust easier than m10. If you treat it well it’s a great camera apart from video, and Italian flag syndrome when using wide non retro focus lenses. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve edmunds Posted May 8 Share #15 Posted May 8 On 5/7/2025 at 5:55 PM, mottykytu said: Why? you can add one anytime ? great, let me know where in the UK and i will buy one , I am on MPB waiting list if a used one turns up. thanks in advance for your help. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vkdev Posted May 21 Share #16 Posted May 21 (edited) I had four M240 cameras. One of them wouldn't record files at +5C and below. The second one would freeze at random times. The third one's filter started to corrode a bit (not like the m9, but like any other camera). and one works perfectly. I currently have a m246 that looks like it's been shot a million times, but it works great. I don't think it's very important to know the shutter count, you're unlikely to shoot another 500,000 times. If the camera looks like it's been used little, it doesn't have a million shots. It's hard to check for smudging issues. It's easy to check the sensor, just take a few shots at f16. also you may be able to see micro scratches that appeared from cleaning the sensor. Edited May 21 by vkdev Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now