pgk Posted March 13 Share #41 Posted March 13 Advertisement (gone after registration) 2 hours ago, Einst_Stein said: Whatever you post here is pixeled down to 2.73MB file size, right? Most digital cameras can produce much larger file. So, what do you think this can prove? Not really trying to prove anything other than these old lenses can still produce pleasant and viable photographs. Resolution isn't everything; overall contrast and the ability to retain shadow detail is just as useful. Obviously they aren't as technically competent as modern lenses (they are uncoated for a start) but they are perfectly usable within whatever constraints you place on them in when outputting for an effectively viewable image. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 13 Posted March 13 Hi pgk, Take a look here 6x6 folding film camera resolution, ---- Should I get a 6x6 Folding camera?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Einst_Stein Posted March 14 Author Share #42 Posted March 14 7 hours ago, pgk said: Not really trying to prove anything other than these old lenses can still produce pleasant and viable photographs. Resolution isn't everything; overall contrast and the ability to retain shadow detail is just as useful. Obviously they aren't as technically competent as modern lenses (they are uncoated for a start) but they are perfectly usable within whatever constraints you place on them in when outputting for an effectively viewable image. Old soldiers never die. The 6x6 foldings and other MF will never loose their charm. It's the digitals that are catching up fast. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
demourne Posted May 6 Share #43 Posted May 6 If I may submit my thoughts... I have a couple of 6x6 cameras. Nowadays I stick to a Rolleiflex 3.5f. Has a 75mm Carl Zeiss Planar. Excellent IQ. And it is rather light and compact. I also have a Voigtländer Perkeo II. Good camera as well, but, the viewfinder is small and difficult to use, if you're wearing glasses. It has no light meter and no range finder. Therefore stopping down is the way to go. But, very light, and very compact when folded. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jim Posted July 15 Share #44 Posted July 15 (edited) I thought I’d post here in the hope someone can help. I’ve been offered a Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta 531/2. The serial number of this camera indicates it is pre WW2 so 1938 - 39 with no coating. The lens looks very clean but the seller reports there is a “rainbow” like reflection from the front lens. Is this normal or a sign of problems (cleaning, haze, glass aging) ? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited July 15 by Big Jim Edit Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/419628-6x6-folding-film-camera-resolution-should-i-get-a-6x6-folding-camera/?do=findComment&comment=5833868'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now