Anyone traded their Q3 43 for Q3 28?

[bqwertpl]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello, 

 

Just wanted to give you all an update. I finally got the Leica - the Q3 43 mm today. 
Today was also a great day because I got someone on FB marketplace who bought my Sony Rx1R II that I got in 2017. I was able to get $2000 for it so I am very happy. 

 

Thank you everyone for a lot of great comments!

[Kim Dahl]

Congratulations. You will definitely be happy with it. Impressive that Sony after so many years can be sold for such a good price. Congratulations.

[goldgranada]

On 1/15/2025 at 12:37 PM, goldgranada said:

Having the Q3 28mm & Q3 43mm is the way to go, found a perfect fit case that's really worth the money and has a feature that has not yet hit most of the sling bags, Peter McKinnon "Nomatic 8L (8 liter size) that allows two Q cameras to fit nicely and has a unique feature for quick closure without the use of the zipper! Position the cameras back to back, in the center, using only one separator and it's perfect fit.

See them here: https://www.nomatic.com/collections/best-sellers/products/mckinnon-camera-sling-8l

 

[mcqinternational]

have just traded in my Q3 43mm for 28mm just like the bite at f1.7 over f2 and 35mm framelines when used and its a Q2

[S Maclean]

I am an M11 shooter that got caught on the sl3 world. Basically between those two systems there’s nothing that cante be covered.

i had a q2 and let it go because I didn’t resonate enough with it. It was technically my wife’s but she wanted a d8 instead.

so I got  a q3 43 and in floored. It’s incredible, it’s perfect but……. The 28 is far more flexible if that’s your only camera on hand. 
 

I traveled with the q2 and had some great captures taken withought a thought and with a little cropping.

the q3 43 is, IMO a better camera and lens, but, since it’s a fixed lens, it’s only best if you’re committed to 43 and above. Then it’s an amazing choice.

if you want a more flexible range to work from the 28’s are a better choice.

so, basically, if you’re a 50 shooter and want to play …. Q343 is it. If you’re a 35 or an iPhone shooter and want quality optic s to play with. 28.

[JNK100]

9 hours ago, S Maclean said:

I am an M11 shooter that got caught on the sl3 world. Basically between those two systems there’s nothing that cante be covered.

i had a q2 and let it go because I didn’t resonate enough with it. It was technically my wife’s but she wanted a d8 instead.

so I got  a q3 43 and in floored. It’s incredible, it’s perfect but……. The 28 is far more flexible if that’s your only camera on hand. 
 

I traveled with the q2 and had some great captures taken withought a thought and with a little cropping.

the q3 43 is, IMO a better camera and lens, but, since it’s a fixed lens, it’s only best if you’re committed to 43 and above. Then it’s an amazing choice.

if you want a more flexible range to work from the 28’s are a better choice.

so, basically, if you’re a 50 shooter and want to play …. Q343 is it. If you’re a 35 or an iPhone shooter and want quality optic s to play with. 28.

You don't need to be an "iPhone shooter" to like the 28mm focal length....

...

[S Maclean]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 hours ago, JNK100 said:

You don't need to be an "iPhone shooter" to like the 28mm focal length....

...

Of course not. Sorry if I offended you. 28 mm is a great FL. And I actually love the images that come from it.  Looking into the Leica magazine gallery, as well as the images on this site, make that clear.

for some reason I don’t resonate with it though. It’s strange because I love the images but when I’m the one taking the shot it’s just not in me.  21mm yes, 24 yes, 28 I often don’t get the right shot and find myself cropping. 35 and above I’m always comfortable. 
 

just me.  

[JNK100]

10 hours ago, S Maclean said:

Of course not. Sorry if I offended you. 28 mm is a great FL. And I actually love the images that come from it.  Looking into the Leica magazine gallery, as well as the images on this site, make that clear.

for some reason I don’t resonate with it though. It’s strange because I love the images but when I’m the one taking the shot it’s just not in me.  21mm yes, 24 yes, 28 I often don’t get the right shot and find myself cropping. 35 and above I’m always comfortable. 
 

just me.  

Not a problem!

I got my love of 28mm after getting a Q3. I imagined I would crop a lot but rarely do.

[PhotoCruiser]

Am 3.2.2025 um 05:11 schrieb S Maclean:

if you want a more flexible range to work from the 28’s are a better choice.

Yes exactly

The Q series (as any other camera with a fixed lens too) has a old fashioned kind of zoom, it's called legs and walking.
If walking towards or from the scene is not possible then the 28mm save a given situation where the 43mm is too short to get all in the picture, and that is exactly the reason why i prefer the 28mm, but thats me. However, i know that feeling to use a lens and not getting warm/resonate with her and it's certainly every owns decision what he likes more.
Maybe it's also as i love to use 14/15mm wide angle lenses for wide open spaces landscape is one of my favourite things to photograph and just watch so i am biased in this direction, the opposite of a 50mm or a tele shooter.

Chris

 

[mcqinternational]

yes I changed to 28mm Q3 then Q3 43mm and then Q2 , I just don't like flippy screen probably would have stuck with a regular Q if had a bit more weather resistant less is more lesson learned indeed kinda like M10 - M11 .

[Jed Buchwald]

Nope - bought both and carry them together in a Thinktank mirrorless mover bag.

[PhotoCruiser]

In May 2019 i bought a Q in Geneva as the Q2 was not available in all Europe and then in August 2019 i could get a Q2 in Germany.
I remember that the Q2 was quite superior to the Q, starting with the much better EVF the Q2 has and then the sealing what matters to me as i carry the cameras a bit all over the world and off the beaten tracks.
Not sure if the Q3 28mm is a real step ahead over the Q2, but the Q2 was one over the Q.

Chris

[costa43]

On 2/4/2025 at 6:16 PM, PhotoCruiser said:

In May 2019 i bought a Q in Geneva as the Q2 was not available in all Europe and then in August 2019 i could get a Q2 in Germany.
I remember that the Q2 was quite superior to the Q, starting with the much better EVF the Q2 has and then the sealing what matters to me as i carry the cameras a bit all over the world and off the beaten tracks.
Not sure if the Q3 28mm is a real step ahead over the Q2, but the Q2 was one over the Q.

Chris

My wife has a Q2 and I have a Q3, the differences are there but not so major in my opinion. Single point AFS is quick in both cameras, AFC is better in the Q3, I do find the face detect much more effective in the Q3 and very usable for slow moving subjects. I’m not a pixel peeper but image quality seems very good in both, the Q3 holds onto the highlight data a little better and has a little more resolution so I would assume you can get away with a bit more there, but I’ve used both and I can barely notice a difference. The Q2 has a nicer look without the protruding rear screen but I’m a big fan of it personally and accept the trade off, I use it a lot for lower shots and would miss it if it wasn’t there. Subjective, but I much prefer the colours from the dng conversions in LR coming off the Q3. Leica did a good job with these. The AWB isn’t the best but once that is corrected, the colours work for me. The Q3 also feels more responsive as one would expect from a newer model.

[midnightsun]

I really like my Q3 43.   I carry it 84% of the time.  I also have a Q with 28 and an M with a 28 Summilux.  So, I have choices.