Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have the S1 (5.76), SL (4.4 I think), and the odd ball TL2 with the visoflex 020 (2.3 I think).   So, I think the S1 has the nicest - but when shooting vintage - I find the SL and the TL2 work better - why - I think they allow for further magnification vs the S1.  First - anyone - anyway to tell why they are working betting - via the specs that are published.

Second part - Anyone have S1 & a S5II.   With manual focus (zoomed in via EVF) - how's the comparison.  I played with one at Robert's - is felt smoother, but didn't seem to magnify / zoom in any further than the S1 (and I didn't' have the S1 with me).

Just fishing for insight.  Thanx in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the S1 and SL2s side by side - the SL2s has the better EVF for manual focusing, I usually only use the S1 with AF. The better sensor of the SL2s results in a better image in the EVF - even without magnification.

It's not the EVF data that shows the performance, but the sensor output that determines the image - especially with good vintage lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Biotar did you have the SL before the SL2S.  I tried it - and was a bit biased as muscle memory for the SL button layout - and used to 'blindly' zoom in to focus in B/W.  Did NOT find all that much difference between them (may have been an error on my part - but thought I set it up properly).  I did not use peaking - just visual, and noticed the SL2S got darker the closer in I got, while the SL was always bright (and bigger?).  Released the SL2S (huge price difference), as I captured my SL for a bargain, and was paying real money for the SL2S.

That said you are the FIRST to explain this - it's the sensor output - and greatly appreciate you releasing me from chasing specs as my eyes seem to be aging faster than my body.  

If you have tried others you were impressed with - do let me know.  Have toyed with what the Next purchase will be.  I do not own anything worth a darn in the Autofocus realm - and would like to have something I could occasionally shoot vintage and actually get the shot, while maintaining the ability to zoom/focus manually. 

THANX>

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Am 24.10.2024 um 20:20 schrieb AdjusterBrett:

That said you are the FIRST to explain this - it's the sensor output - and greatly appreciate you releasing me from chasing specs as my eyes seem to be aging faster than my body. 

That took some time for me too. 😉

Am 24.10.2024 um 20:20 schrieb AdjusterBrett:

If you have tried others you were impressed with - do let me know.  Have toyed with what the Next purchase will be.  I do not own anything worth a darn in the Autofocus realm - and would like to have something I could occasionally shoot vintage and actually get the shot, while maintaining the ability to zoom/focus manually. 

I am afraid, or rather glad, that there is currently nothing better. Fortunately, more MP does not result in better EVF performance. The 24MP is completely sufficient for me, as I never delete images.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...