Leica SL2 vs SL2s - real world use.

[Cattoo]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Given your use-cases (portraits and studio) I would lean toward the SL2-S. As has been mentioned, they are similar in many respects. I have both, and my preference is generally for the SL2, but I use mine almost exclusively for landscape photography where the added resolution helps.  The SL2-S is far more versatile for general use though and the lower resolution might be preferable for portrait work anyway.  As has been mentioned, you can always upscale with software when you need to...for that landscape photo you take while traveling.  The SL2-S also excels in low light, processes images fast and so has a faster burst rate. (also good for studio), and seems to focus more quickly with native lenses.  At least mine does.  

[Jeff S]

Apologize for one more OT regarding language. This video was appropriately linked today at The Online Photographer…

Jeff

[andybarton]

16 hours ago, Jeff S said:

Or wanting to learn.

Jeff

Some, not all.

[costa43]

I recently tried a friends sl2 with a Sigma 105mm macro and was blown away by the quality of that combo. If you prioritise outright image quality then it's difficult to look past the sl2, it was that good. I did not try that lens on the sl2s though so no direct comparison there. The camera at lower ISO sings and would be my choice if I was sure that the majority of my work would be controlled/low ISO or if I was printing larger than around a2.

FWIW, I went for the sl2s as I wanted an all in one option that does everything well. Better ISO, DR, speed etc. I also prefer vintage lenses over modern optics when shooting people and feel that lower resolution sensors give me a 'look' that I prefer over their higher resolution sisters. 

Best of luck in your decision making. 

Edited June 17, 2024 by costa43

[Olaf_ZG]

Iso6400 on the sl2s

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[aspherical]

On 6/15/2024 at 2:18 PM, Oliver Christie said:

At the risk of stirring up a hornet's nest again...  I am looking to purchase an SL2 or SL2s but am not sure what to go for. 

My use case is a mix of environmental portraits, studio-based portraits with strobe, and some travel. I already have a Q2, but don't need to match that output.

I will be printing at a large scale, so the SL2 seems a better match. However, I am occasionally going to be in lower-light situations where the SL2s make sense. This is my dilemma. 

For those who have used both, what do you prefer and why? Or should I not worry too much and just shoot?

 

I have two Nikons (D850 and 610) and my SL2 shoots just as well. I do wish the menu system were a little faster to use. But the optical quality makes up for everything. I shoot landscapes and people. Shooting in lower light depends on the base aperture of the lens.

[Oliver Christie]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have just ordered an SL2, it was hard to make the decision, even with such good advice on this forum. Thank you one and all. 

In the end, I could have gone with either camera and adjusted my workflow as needed. 

It is a testament that Leica could put out two such similar yet different cameras in the same body.

 

[Leicaboy Norway]

On 6/16/2024 at 4:42 PM, Jeff S said:

I’m well aware, and envious of more multilingual abilities.  This was meant as humor, not criticism or arrogance.  Maybe a smiley would have helped (or not in your view).  Btw, I wouldn’t even begin to write in Icelandic.

 

Never mind

Edited June 19, 2024 by Leicaboy Norway