petereprice Posted September 16, 2023 Share #1  Posted September 16, 2023 Advertisement (gone after registration) Looking for good telephoto options for my SL2-S.  Either a 70-200 zoom or a 135mm prime.  I don’t see many options other than the Panasonic 70-200 f2.8 and f4 and it looks likes Sigma has a LM older 135mm f1.8 HSM prime that was converted from their DSLR line.  Any other options out there?  I don’t want something too heavy but also would like something at f2.8 if possible.  I could do long prime or zoom.  Getting ready to shoot the NY Marathon for the first time with my Leica SL2-S. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Hi petereprice, Take a look here Telephoto Zoom or Prime Suggestions?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Pierre68 Posted September 16, 2023 Share #2 Â Posted September 16, 2023 Why not Leica's Vario Elmarit 90-280 f2.8-4? I have Bothe the Leica VE and Sigma's 135 f/1.8 DG HSM and they see a different use case. For sporting even (horse race) the zoom is more convenient For live music id^n dark venues the 135mm is better. It s also a great portrait lens 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff C. Bassett Posted September 17, 2023 Share #3  Posted September 17, 2023 Sigma is rumored to announce a 70-200 for L mount soon, if you can hold off and wait for that I would. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardC Posted September 19, 2023 Share #4 Â Posted September 19, 2023 On 9/16/2023 at 10:27 AM, petereprice said: Sigma has a LM older 135mm f1.8 HSM prime that was converted from their DSLR line That Sigma Art 135/1.8 is considered by some to be one of the sharpest lenses ever made. It is a bit heavy (200g more than Canon and Sony equivalents), but it isn't bigger than mirrorless designs. The weight might rule it out for you, since you mentioned that was a factor. I personally prefer a faster 135 over any 80-200 lens. Longer lenses don't work well for human features, because the flattening effect "adds 5 kilos." Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now