Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Looks like a good lens to release! I had the 35lux asph and I loved it for and only sold when I offloaded my whole M system for a few years. The AA was around 10k when I was in that market but now even sillier $ 
 

Edited by rich_
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, rtai said:

I didn’t buy it to shoot at f8. There are better lenses for that. It’s a portrait lens meant to be shot at or near max aperture. 

Ok, so yours does it too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Simone_DF said:

Do you mean that time when Fuji released a camera that looked like an expensive Leica and Leica released a camera that looked like a cheap Fuji?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

YES!  NO!  Wait, what?  NYES!

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Huss said:

Ok, so yours does it too.

Haven’t used it much yet and nothing beyond f2.8.

But of course you are right. You are right. You are right. And I am signing off.

Edited by rtai
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Huss said:

Ok, so yours does it too.

They all do it. It's just a PITA for film shooters. Strange, though, I don't think the prototype SP II I tried had the same issue. I have an idea that it's the built-in UV filter. When I get my replacement SP II next week (was sent black instead of black with brassing), I plan to remove the UV with a spanner wrench and retest.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...