Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

9 hours ago, BastianK said:

I have some questions here.
The MTF graph makes absolutely no sense, fullframe corner is at 21.6mm, not 12mm.
Apart from that the MTF look really really bad, how those translate into real pictures can also easily be seen in the sample images at 35mmc.
 

This is nowhere close to the MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 stopped down, which is fully usable at f/11 even in the very corners (on film and digital btw).

This 24mm f/11 is barely better than a pinhole lens.

It a $125 fixed aperture lens. It is what it is. This is a novelty lens and it is being marketed as such ("snapshot"). Some can find a use for it by exploiting its faults. Expecting good MFT graphs and technical sharpness for $125 is ridiculous.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 84bravo said:

It a $125 fixed aperture lens. It is what it is. This is a novelty lens and it is being marketed as such ("snapshot"). Some can find a use for it by exploiting its faults. Expecting good MFT graphs and technical sharpness for $125 is ridiculous.

I agree. Part of the problem is that the shots in the link discussed above

https://www.flickr.com/photos/hamishgill/52331457773/in/album-72177720301801541/

are horrible and seem to be designed to show how bad and pointless the lens is. I am sure it can be creatively used in other ways. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...