Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would think you will be fine with 170 MB/s card if you don't shoot video, unless you do a lot of burst shooting, in which case you may hit the buffer limit. With how I shoot my Q2, I have never hit the buffer limit so I'm sure a slower card would be fine, but now that they have added 400 Mbps video codecs I will be using only 300 MB/s cards even though technically anything above 50 MB/s should work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on if you are shooting events and bursts.  In my work, I often fill up the buffer, and waiting for a slow card would be impossible.  I use the prograde 300/250 cards, or the Sony tough 300/299 cards.

You really only need one big card, and you just bought a $5000 camera.  Spend a few hundred bucks and get a fast card (unless you are shooting landscapes!)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mikelevitt said:

It depends on if you are shooting events and bursts.  In my work, I often fill up the buffer, and waiting for a slow card would be impossible.  I use the prograde 300/250 cards, or the Sony tough 300/299 cards.

You really only need one big card, and you just bought a $5000 camera.  Spend a few hundred bucks and get a fast card (unless you are shooting landscapes!)

I use those two V90 cards as well.  Excellent results.  Overkill?  Maybe.  I'm not going to scrimp on the cards.  And the 170mb SanDisc cards are *really* slow IMO.  Unusable for burst shooting in my other cameras.  

Edited by liggy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...