benqui Posted January 8, 2022 Share #1 Posted January 8, 2022 Advertisement (gone after registration) I tested the Hasselblad 907x with the 2.0/90 Apo-Summicron for the first time. Maybe not the best idea to put this lens on a medium format camera, but I really like the result. And I was lucky that my son was in the mood for a portrait (which is approx. 2 times/year) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 19 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/328207-just-a-test/?do=findComment&comment=4348454'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 Hi benqui, Take a look here Just a test. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
elmars Posted January 8, 2022 Share #2 Posted January 8, 2022 vor 57 Minuten schrieb benqui: And I was lucky that my son was in the mood for a portrait (which is approx. 2 times/year) Same here. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaticB Posted January 15, 2022 Share #3 Posted January 15, 2022 I'm curious, since you using both of them - Hasselblad 907x and Q2 - how would do you compare file quality in terms of colour reproduction, tonality, sharpness... Many thanx, Matic 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bateleur Posted January 16, 2022 Share #4 Posted January 16, 2022 Its a great portrait all the same, the shadow is wonderful. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted January 16, 2022 Author Share #5 Posted January 16, 2022 vor 14 Stunden schrieb MaticB: I'm curious, since you using both of them - Hasselblad 907x and Q2 - how would do you compare file quality in terms of colour reproduction, tonality, sharpness... Many thanx, Matic Not so easy to compare both, the systems are really different. The AF is faster at the Q2 and you have face detection, which you do not find with the 907x. Both have a beautiful color reproduction, I like a bit more the colors of the 907, almost no need for postproduction. The XCD lenses are very very sharp, also the very compact 4/45. For street and if you need a fast camera, I would choose the Q2. But for portrait shootings the 907 with the XCD lenses is really special, I like it very very much. It is so much fun to use it. But you need the handgrip. vor 1 Stunde schrieb Bateleur: Its a great portrait all the same, the shadow is wonderful. Glad you like it Charles! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaticB Posted January 16, 2022 Share #6 Posted January 16, 2022 26 minutes ago, benqui said: Not so easy to compare both, the systems are really different. The AF is faster at the Q2 and you have face detection, which you do not find with the 907x. Both have a beautiful color reproduction, I like a bit more the colors of the 907, almost no need for postproduction. The XCD lenses are very very sharp, also the very compact 4/45. For street and if you need a fast camera, I would choose the Q2. But for portrait shootings the 907 with the XCD lenses is really special, I like it very very much. It is so much fun to use it. But you need the handgrip. Glad you like it Charles! Many many thanx. I really appreciate the answer of real users, not just "youtube" vlogers. I like my Leicas M240 and Q2, but consider also Hasselblad 907 from real reasons you quoted! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted January 16, 2022 Author Share #7 Posted January 16, 2022 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) Thank you Matic! The 907 is for sure not a camera for everyday and I never thought that I like to take photos without a viewfinder, but it works very good. The 4/45 photos can be cropped without any problems. If you have the possibility to test one, give it a try! Edited January 16, 2022 by benqui 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oliviersm Posted January 16, 2022 Share #8 Posted January 16, 2022 Hi @benqui did you have to crop at all or is that the full photo? Thanks for sharing. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted January 16, 2022 Author Share #9 Posted January 16, 2022 vor 6 Minuten schrieb oliviersm: Hi @benqui did you have to crop at all or is that the full photo? Thanks for sharing. Hi Oliviers, it is uncropped Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oliviersm Posted January 16, 2022 Share #10 Posted January 16, 2022 Impressive image circle. My 75mm summi and 50mm nocti both had very hard vignetting on the GFX50R. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted January 16, 2022 Author Share #11 Posted January 16, 2022 vor 3 Stunden schrieb oliviersm: Impressive image circle. My 75mm summi and 50mm nocti both had very hard vignetting on the GFX50R. I also tried it with the pre asph Summilux 1.4/35 and the 2/50, but I also had a very strong vignetting. The 90mm was the only lens with a good result Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oliviersm Posted January 18, 2022 Share #12 Posted January 18, 2022 Being absolute expert in anything other than lens design , I could imagine that Leica designs the image circle as close as it needs to, so it can prioritise other factors? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StS Posted January 23, 2022 Share #13 Posted January 23, 2022 Test passed Stefan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted January 25, 2022 Author Share #14 Posted January 25, 2022 Am 23.1.2022 um 19:53 schrieb StS: Test passed Stefan Happy to hear this😉 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now