Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Leica M-E 240 with TTArtisan 11/2.8 fisheye M-lens. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What about a filter that makes any lens dreamy?

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cron APO 50 and some photo editing adjustments

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 22 Stunden schrieb lexontario:

Cron APO 50 and some photo editing adjustments

Yes I think the APO Cron 50 is a crazy lens but only in respect of the price. I think the photo could be moved to the Digital Processing sub forum. 🤭

Link to post
Share on other sites

SL2-S + KMZ TAIR 11-A 135mm

20 Aperture Blades =

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

8 hours ago, 01maciel said:

Sorry but a filter is not part of a lens. 😇

What if the filter *is* the (micro)lens(es)? 😏

And on a more conventional note, here's some original Zeiss Sonnar 50mm f/1.5 with its 13 aperture blades, on Kodak Pro Image 100.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 21 Minuten schrieb giannis:

And on a more conventional note, here's some original Zeiss Sonnar 50mm f/1.5 with its 13 aperture blades, on Kodak Pro Image 100.

Thanks, that's fine. A short description is always helpful. Is your Zeiss Sonnar an old lens? My new Sonnar has just 10 blades.

vor 22 Minuten schrieb giannis:

What if the filter *is* the (micro)lens(es)? 😏

Never heard about this. Do you take photos without a lens but a filter in front of your camera? That'll be interesting, maybe you have some photos how it looks like?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 01maciel said:

Is your Zeiss Sonnar an old lens? My new Sonnar has just 10 blades.

Yes, it's the original version for the Contax rangefinders (I, II, IIa).

 

2 minutes ago, 01maciel said:

Never heard about this.

Well that was a bit tongue in cheek on my part 😇

It's just a special filter (that goes on top of the lens), that is made up with droplet-like microlenses that scatter light somewhat, giving a softfocus effect that is different to uniform diffusion (i.e. it affects sources of light much more). To my knowledge, only Zeiss (now B+W) and Hoya make such filters (Zeiss calls them Softars and come in 3 strengths, Hoya calls them Softener and come in 2 strengths).

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 2 Stunden schrieb giannis:

Yes, it's the original version for the Contax rangefinders (I, II, IIa).

Is it a M39 mount and rangefinder coupled?

BTW,  the Jupiter-3 50mm 1:1.5 is a copy of your Zeiss Sonnar

Edited by 01maciel
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 01maciel said:

Is it a M39 mount and rangefinder coupled?

 

Nah mine is Contax Bayonet mount and I use it on a Contax IIa, and on digital with an adapter made from the mount of a Kiev 4 body (Contax II clone). The Contax 50mm lenses are particularly hard to adapt in general, because they lack a focusing helicoid, since that is built into the Contax bodies. There are some that came in M39 from the factory, but those are quite rare.

And yes you're right, the Jupiter-3 is an exact clone, more like a clone under license technically speaking, of the prewar Sonnar. IIRC it has the same number of blades and everything is the same as the prewar Sonnars, with the exception of barrel material (brass vs aluminium in the Jupiter, the Sonnar is heavier), and coatings (virtually all Jupiters have it, while very few prewar Sonnars do). After the war, the Sonnar got recalculated, but the optical formula didn't change iirc, it was a simple recalculation for the indices of new types of glass, T coating, and (unfortunately, for my taste) 11 ninja-star aperture blades, which I'm guessing they did to minimise somewhat focus shift.

I really like the Sonnar look and the old Sonnars and Jupiters (50mm f/1.5, 85mm f/2) are excellent examples of that look, and the new 7Artisans 50mm f/1.1 is an *excellent* example of that look too, and at a very affordable price thankfully. The Contax RFs (and Kievs) are quite nice cameras to use too, btw. Only let down by their VFs, if we're judging from a modern perspective (the M3 with its great viewfinder changed the lanscape radically, when introduced). But from the perspective of the time they were introduced, ironically they had the best VF, since it was a combined vf-rf.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Strong and gusty winds

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

M10 + Helios 40-2 1:1.5/85

Edited by 01maciel
Resized image
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...