How does SL and M compare with M lens?

[northernlights]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi, 

I have found a lot of materials online and i just have not found the specific answer from posts in 2015 after SL was launched right through to multiple reviews of SL and M lenses.  

My experience with the M240 and 35 Lux M at f1.4 under strong sunlight subject focused well and shot at about 3.5m is a very creamy bokeh with a very strong micro contrast resulting in a 3D pop out. I hope i can see this in the SL with M lenses. I am not going after SL with native SL lenses which i believe will achieve this.  

Hence, i thought of rewording here very plainly:

SL + 35 lux FLE vs M240 + 35 Lux FLE. F1.4 wide open. Will the same 3D look be achieved.
This is the reference pic 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/prisonersdilemma/49444294866/in/dateposted/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/prisonersdilemma/49256635408/in/dateposted/

i hope if i jump into the SL wagon, i can still see this. 

Thanks. 

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama