Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I've just been photographing in Hokkaido Japan in pure snow conditions. Despite reviewing the miniature average JPEG histogram and checking exposure setting the accuracy of the limited preview graph leaves something to be desire, since it does not realistically represent the RAW file. When reviewed in Lightroom it clearly shows the blue channel to be well to the right compared with the red and green channels, and perilously close to 255. Appreciate that the histogram is of the JPEG file but don't understand why oh why does the pro SL not have this feature as is the case on all the makes of pro camera, Nikon/Canon/Hasselblad.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.rawdigger.com/

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two separate issues here. One, does the camera show an R,G,B trio of histograms? Two, does the camera show histograms of raw data?

Yes to the first feature on various cameras - all based on the camera JPG. (Note, you could set the camera to generate AdobeRGB JPGs and see if that helps you get more dynamic range.)

On the second issue, no camera I know shows histograms of raw data. But what would these be? In your raw developer program, you will see the histograms shift as you adjust the white balance. The histogram trio of an image - which must have one or another white balance for the program to produce it - will therefore be different than a simple superposition of the raw R,G, and B independent histograms. Perhaps that is why it takes a specialized program like Rawdigger to display the latter, with various admonitions when you read the manual. Perhaps that is why Rawdigger remains a niche program and why the UniWB technique for capturing the most dynamic range remains a cumbersome method used by few photographers.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CharlesL said:

 

On the second issue, no camera I know shows histograms of raw data. 

 

The original Monochrom does (kicks in after first displaying the JPEG based histogram), and it’s very helpful given that blown highlights can’t be recovered in PP by saving any color channels. The next generation Monochrom (M246) lacks this feature (as does the M9, upon which the first MM was based).

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CharlesL said:

The absence of R,G,B, hence only luminance data, is a rather different situation.

Sure, as I noted, but you said you didn’t know of ANY camera with a RAW hustogram.  And I think it’s also noteworthy that not even the second generation Monochrom has the capability.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...