sub_quercu_felicitas Posted June 30, 2007 Share #1 Â Posted June 30, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hello, I am the proud new owner of a D-Lux 3. I am happy with its performance so far. This summer's holiday will be spent in London, Paris and Venice. Will I be happy with the results I get from the D-lux 3 or should I pack around my Compu Trekker with D200, 70-200VR, D70, 18-55, and several other lenses and flash. The weight alone scares me, but I want good results. Â Thanks in advance! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 30, 2007 Posted June 30, 2007 Hi sub_quercu_felicitas, Take a look here Your Opinion Please (D-Lux 3). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
tommycrown Posted June 30, 2007 Share #2 Â Posted June 30, 2007 Mark, Â I have traveled all those places except Paris when I had Nikon FM2 (film of course) Â As a proud Leica Dlux 3 owner, you may understand both strengths and weaknesses of the camera. Â First, the camera is small and take excellent outdoor photos. Â Second, even night shots are pretty usable. Â third, if you have a slave flash, even an indoor shots can be flashy nice. Â However, you cannot compare the shots from this camera to Nikon D200 or D70. Â If you are extremely serious about the quality of photos, then take your D200/D70, but if you are traveling for fun and just want some snap shots, take Dlux 3. Â Most of all, fun should be a big factor to your photography whether it's a hobby or a job. Â Good luck and share some photos when you are back... Â Tommy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sub_quercu_felicitas Posted June 30, 2007 Author Share #3 Â Posted June 30, 2007 Tommy, Thanks for the info! I suppose I could benefit from the extra weight workout. I will try to use all three. It will make for an interesting comparison. Â Cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_parker Posted July 1, 2007 Share #4  Posted July 1, 2007 Mark  Where the D-Lux 3 comes into its own is those times where you want to travel light and don't want the weight of a camera bag, or situations where you normally wouldn't have tried to taket a camera - the D - Lux 3 is pretty much able to slip into a coat pocket and you can carry it anywhere without noticing the weight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Gruyters Posted July 1, 2007 Share #5 Â Posted July 1, 2007 How do you all cope with no viewfinder on the D Lux 3? Â Regs, PJG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest malland Posted July 1, 2007 Share #6  Posted July 1, 2007 There nothing exceptional about using a small sensor camera for a trip to Paris, as long as you're familiar with the camera and can use it with ease. Here is a picture taken with the D-Lux 3:   ...and here is a series of Paris pictures talen with the Ricoh GR-D:   As for not having a vewfinder — I like shooting by framing with the LCD monitor because it leads, or forces, me to a more "fluid" and "looser" shooting style than I had with my M6: I only use the LCD for framing — for establishing the edges of the picture — and usually look at the subject when taking the shot.  You can also look a pages 5-6 of my flickr site for D-Lux 3 pictures:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/10268776@N00/page5/  —Mitch/Potomac, MD http://www.flickr.com/photos/10268776@N00/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted July 1, 2007 Share #7 Â Posted July 1, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) TRAVEL WARNING: Ok, I have the predecessor to your camera, in the LX1. It rightly lives on 80ISO. Picked it up went for a walk last night woa what a moon. Turns out it is a blue moon. No problems pull a frame. Hang on that went to card pretty quick must be on jpeg no problems scroll the menu back to RAW the clouds are coming quick so get the frame. Â Later...uploading...squizz...WTF!? Check camera...Someone has set it to 200ISO. Results as follows. Now I dont actually have the DLux3/LX2 I have its predecessor. But be warned about travelling away from lower ISO. Â ......[ATTACH]43870[/ATTACH] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest malland Posted July 1, 2007 Share #8  Posted July 1, 2007 No big deal: the picture that I posted above was shot at ISO 200, as was this one:   And the following was shot at ISO 800:   —Mitch/Potomac, MD http://www.flickr.com/photos/10268776@N00/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted July 1, 2007 Share #9 Â Posted July 1, 2007 Yes Mitch, but rough as suits your bangkok series. They are also in b&w not blue. Boost the curves of the colour one you posted and it exposes how cranky that file is. Can you get an acceptable print off it? I have plenty of low light ISO stuff that was pretty good, and it is what I will stick to. The 200RAW producing that file surprised teh heck out of me. Never realised the LX1 could produce anything that cranky in any setting. Aint good. In aside I didnt try to tweak it either. Its a lost cause. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.