Einst_Stein Posted July 1, 2017 Share #1 Posted July 1, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) These two B&W are from Digilux 2. But one is converted from color to BW in camera, the other is converted from color to BW in LR (auto, no hand tweak). Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/273971-bw-out-of-digilux-2-and-converted-by-lr/?do=findComment&comment=3305872'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 Hi Einst_Stein, Take a look here BW out of digilux 2 and converted by LR. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
wda Posted July 1, 2017 Share #2 Posted July 1, 2017 The first one shows the effect of in-camera sharpening. A raw file is capable of yielding an infinite variety of monochromatic results, more than matching OOC jpegs. But the latter please many users. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham (G4FUJ) Posted July 1, 2017 Share #3 Posted July 1, 2017 Parallel Computer Architecture? Heavy! 386/486 was my limit The first is much sharper and preferable to my eyes... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einst_Stein Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share #4 Posted July 1, 2017 The first one shows the effect of in-camera sharpening. A raw file is capable of yielding an infinite variety of monochromatic results, more than matching OOC jpegs. But the latter please many users. I believe they are equally sharpened in camera. Both are Jpeg our of camera, just one is set to BW and the other set to color. To me, the in-camera BW is less grainier on the wall. Its water bottle caps also Is grainier more pleasing? Not for me though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einst_Stein Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share #5 Posted July 1, 2017 Parallel Computer Architecture? Heavy! 386/486 was my limit The first is much sharper and preferable to my eyes...[/quotei It is much like a Leica camera, feels heavy on hand. 20 years old, (published on 1998) and yet still the king in its kind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.