Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 16, 2016 Share #1 Posted December 16, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Okay The pixel puffters are going to love this thread. Below are some pictures taken with the Leica SL and also with the Zeiss Otus 55mm f1.4 and the Noctilux 50mm f0.95 The first one was taken with the Zeiss Otus 1/. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! The second one was taken with the Noctilux 2/. The third one of my Butifun Wife was with the Noctilux 3/. The last was with the Zeiss 4/. Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! The second one was taken with the Noctilux 2/. The third one of my Butifun Wife was with the Noctilux 3/. The last was with the Zeiss 4/. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/267417-leica-sl-with-noctilux-095-and-zeiss-otus-55mm-14/?do=findComment&comment=3167825'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 16, 2016 Posted December 16, 2016 Hi Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS, Take a look here Leica SL with Noctilux 0.95 and Zeiss Otus 55mm 1.4. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
dancook Posted December 16, 2016 Share #2 Posted December 16, 2016 Well I prefer the zeiss images, but I think the notcilux excels better when the subject is further from the camera - only the farside eye of your wife is in focus, leaving a massive area of her head out of focus and distracting - the zeiss dof composition, lighting and pose is much nicer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted December 16, 2016 Share #3 Posted December 16, 2016 Excellent! Nice new toys for Christmas! Can you please do a wide open comparison between your Noctilux and the 70mm Summarit on your S at some stage? Pretty please? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 16, 2016 Share #4 Posted December 16, 2016 Excellent! Nice new toys for Christmas! Can you please do a wide open comparison between your Noctilux and the 70mm Summarit on your S at some stage? Pretty please? Will do mate............I will be back in the UK next week and taking S and SL . I plan to take a bunch of pictures of my newly born grandson :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted December 16, 2016 Share #5 Posted December 16, 2016 Will do mate............I will be back in the UK next week and taking S and SL . I plan to take a bunch of pictures of my newly born grandson :) Wow, congrats all round mate! Happy days :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieri Posted December 16, 2016 Share #6 Posted December 16, 2016 Shooting data, please Neil? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbonetics Posted December 16, 2016 Share #7 Posted December 16, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Nice works. #1 & 2 was shot at what aperture? I noticed the colours are different, was it straight our of camera or tweak in PP? Personally i prefer the "flarer" looking Noctilux. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivar B Posted December 18, 2016 Share #8 Posted December 18, 2016 Will do mate............I will be back in the UK next week and taking S and SL . I plan to take a bunch of pictures of my newly born grandson :) May I ask which mount your Otus is equipped with? In a different thread we have some discussions regarding lack of compatibility with the Otus, Canon EOS mount and Novoflex adapter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffWright Posted December 18, 2016 Share #9 Posted December 18, 2016 May I ask which mount your Otus is equipped with? In a different thread we have some discussions regarding lack of compatibility with the Otus, Canon EOS mount and Novoflex adapter. The ZE mount Otus works with the Novoflex adapter. All Zeiss lenses make an unnerving short-lived buzzing sound when the camera is switched on, which is the aperture stopping down. This behavior is identical on the 55 Otus, 85 Milvus, 21 ZE, 35/1.4 ZE, 50 Makro ZE, 100 Makro ZE, and 135/2 ZE, all of which I've tested personally. EXIF data identify the adapted lens as a Voigtlander Ultron 40 mm Aspherical, but the correct focal length is included, and the correct Lens profile can be automatically applied in Lightroom. I've had no lens problems despite many hundreds of shots with 100 Makro and 85 Milvus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivar B Posted December 18, 2016 Share #10 Posted December 18, 2016 The ZE mount Otus works with the Novoflex adapter. All Zeiss lenses make an unnerving short-lived buzzing sound when the camera is switched on, which is the aperture stopping down. This behavior is identical on the 55 Otus, 85 Milvus, 21 ZE, 35/1.4 ZE, 50 Makro ZE, 100 Makro ZE, and 135/2 ZE, all of which I've tested personally. EXIF data identify the adapted lens as a Voigtlander Ultron 40 mm Aspherical, but the correct focal length is included, and the correct Lens profile can be automatically applied in Lightroom. I've had no lens problems despite many hundreds of shots with 100 Makro and 85 Milvus. Many thanks. I tested out for the first time today and like you I experienced the brief stopping down and opening of the aperture. This did not concern me. However, there is a slight delay in shutter release compared to a native SL lens. I can live with this as well - others cannot, it seems. I have the 2/135 in Nikon Mount and there is no stopping down or delay. My Nikon adapter is not the most recent autofocus version. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 18, 2016 Share #11 Posted December 18, 2016 May I ask which mount your Otus is equipped with? In a different thread we have some discussions regarding lack of compatibility with the Otus, Canon EOS mount and Novoflex adapter. Mine has the Nikon mount Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billo101 Posted December 18, 2016 Share #12 Posted December 18, 2016 Do you noticed any difference? Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 18, 2016 Share #13 Posted December 18, 2016 Shooting data, please Neil? 1/. ISO 50 1/40 f ??? 2/. ISO 50 1/80 f3.5 3/. ISO 50 1/3200 f0.95 4/. ISO 50 1/640 f1.4 With the Otus you don't get the f stop data Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 18, 2016 Share #14 Posted December 18, 2016 Nice works. #1 & 2 was shot at what aperture? I noticed the colours are different, was it straight our of camera or tweak in PP? Personally i prefer the "flarer" looking Noctilux. They were both PP the same way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 18, 2016 Share #15 Posted December 18, 2016 Do you noticed any difference? Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk Any difference in what sir ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billo101 Posted December 18, 2016 Share #16 Posted December 18, 2016 Any difference in what sir ?? on web, for these samples, I don't see any difference, for details and bokeh. b Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 18, 2016 Share #17 Posted December 18, 2016 Many thanks. I tested out for the first time today and like you I experienced the brief stopping down and opening of the aperture. This did not concern me. However, there is a slight delay in shutter release compared to a native SL lens. I can live with this as well - others cannot, it seems. I have the 2/135 in Nikon Mount and there is no stopping down or delay. My Nikon adapter is not the most recent autofocus version. my adapter has no electronics you can move the blue ring in between what looks like wide open and stopped down and can only guess that's for lenses without a f stop ring but saying that I don't see anything moving Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieri Posted December 19, 2016 Share #18 Posted December 19, 2016 1/. ISO 50 1/40 f ??? 2/. ISO 50 1/80 f3.5 3/. ISO 50 1/3200 f0.95 4/. ISO 50 1/640 f1.4 With the Otus you don't get the f stop data Thank you Neil. By the way, you don't get accurate f/stop datas with any M lens either. The camera just estimates. I asked hoping you wrote them down Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted December 19, 2016 Share #19 Posted December 19, 2016 Thank you Neil. By the way, you don't get accurate f/stop datas with any M lens either. The camera just estimates. I asked hoping you wrote them down I noticed that too. Many a time I will be shooting wide open and it will say f2 and also at f8 its showing f4 or something like that :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MT0227 Posted December 20, 2016 Share #20 Posted December 20, 2016 This is the one thing that I don't like about the SL thus far; such a pain in the @ss. You'd think this would be something easily solved, not sure why the camera can't just read the actual aperture used. I noticed that too. Many a time I will be shooting wide open and it will say f2 and also at f8 its showing f4 or something like that :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.