BigBabyEarl Posted October 26, 2016 Share #1 Â Posted October 26, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) I had always thought a 28 summilux would be my favorite lens. Now that I own it I have to say first, it is really amazing glass. However, it's also just a bit cumbersome. I love my 50 APO for its size and quality. Would the new 28 Summicron be a better match or should I just learn to deal with the extra size? I have a 35 summilux FLE and the 0.95 50. In terms of a set the summilux 28 fits in, but when it comes down to it- I always seem to grab the 50 APO because of how easy and enjoyable it is to use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 Hi BigBabyEarl, Take a look here 28 Summilux vs 28 Summicron. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
FrozenInTime Posted October 26, 2016 Share #2 Â Posted October 26, 2016 Really small lenses are great for everyday use : The 28 Elmarit is a nice compliment for the 28 Summilux : e.g. an outdoor and indoor / night pairing. Â The 28 Summicron with hood is not much shorter than the 28 Summilux ; without hood about the same as a 50. Â I held back from trading in my 28 Summicron when getting the 28 Summilux; I like all three ; just like multiple 50s, there a time and place where each shines. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGodParticle/Hari Posted October 26, 2016 Share #3 Â Posted October 26, 2016 If you can put up with the 50/0.95, you will also get used to the 28/1.4 Â Â Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmradman Posted October 26, 2016 Share #4  Posted October 26, 2016 If you can put up with the 50/0.95, you will also get used to the 28/1.4   Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1+  Compared to any SLR 28mm it is small and most of them are slower than f1.4 lenses, don't even try Otus 28mm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmradman Posted October 26, 2016 Share #5  Posted October 26, 2016 Just to illustrate previous post; Elmarit R 28mm Mk 2 is a very compact lens but when paired with R-Adapter M it towers Summilux.  All distortion is another 28mm lens equivalent - Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! iPhone 6s. Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! iPhone 6s. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/265845-28-summilux-vs-28-summicron/?do=findComment&comment=3135828'>More sharing options...
haljaberi Posted October 26, 2016 Share #6  Posted October 26, 2016 I own the 28 Summilux , and if I want to check the blockage zone in viewfinder I just open my left eye. It is really amazing glass and I won't substitute it with any other 28mm because of its size  Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeicaPassion Posted October 27, 2016 Share #7 Â Posted October 27, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) ... I won't substitute it with any other 28mm because of its size +1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted October 27, 2016 Share #8 Â Posted October 27, 2016 The 28 Summicron with hood is not much shorter than the 28 Summilux ; without hood about the same as a 50. Â Â Â Like many others, I use the 35 Summilux hood on the 28 Summicron. Â There are other hoods that also work....depending how much coverage one demands. Â Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tmuussoni Posted October 27, 2016 Share #9 Â Posted October 27, 2016 I have the Summicron version #2. I thought about the Summilux for long time, but the size of the Lux kinda turns me off. So I recommend the new Summicron #2. It's best of both worlds between Elmarit and Summilux. the new hood is awesome and in my opinion I prefer the bokeh of the Summicron over the Summilux. It's tad smoother, even if it's slightly less blur. Half the weight (270 g vs 440 g) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.