jonoslack Posted June 14, 2007 Share #21 Posted June 14, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi Norm Smashing - lots of mystery, splendidly composed. I agree - we all want the best from our cameras, and sometimes it's worth putting in lots of effort, but, it isn't technical perfection that makes a photo 'work' it's the idea and the execution. As for the Saab - it was mine, now it's my wife's; 1994 turbo S, one of the last two delivered to the UK, metallic blue with a blue hood. I do high mileage, so I have a boring modern one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 14, 2007 Posted June 14, 2007 Hi jonoslack, Take a look here Black and White Photo. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
norm_snyder Posted June 16, 2007 Share #22 Posted June 16, 2007 Jono-- Thanks, so much. I completely agree that the captured image is the purpose of the entire exercise, and while there are many well designed devices for taking pictures, many of which accomplish this goal with less effort, the M-camera is, for me, anyway, the tool that works best. Sometimes using jpegs seems in keeping with simplifying the whole interface, and reducing it to its essentials. As a former owner of an 1984 SPG turbo, and somewhere in the deep mists of time, a 1967 Saab 93 Monte Carlo, I recall that they were cars designed by airplane engineers to accomplish the goals of an automobile, while at the same time ignoring the stultified engineering routines of most auto companies of the time. They were odd, in their way, fussy at times [i had to run three different plug temperatures on my 3-banger], but the results were worth the effort. Regards, Norm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.