IkarusJohn Posted February 16, 2016 Share #21 Posted February 16, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Sorry, guys - for me, I'm not bothered by the L E I C A in white on the front. It's the same as N i k o n I had for years, and to be honest, the EVF hump with nothing on it (shown above) looks worse to my eye. It's a Leica. What do I care if people see what it's called. It's no different to Sony, Canon, Fuji or any of the opposition. Granted, the M cameras look better without the red dot and with the traditional script (to me). But on the SL, neither the name nor the red dot bother me in the slightest, and with the name taped over, it just looks odd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 16, 2016 Posted February 16, 2016 Hi IkarusJohn, Take a look here Taking out the white LEICA paint.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
dkCambridgeshire Posted February 16, 2016 Share #22 Posted February 16, 2016 Sorry, guys - for me, I'm not bothered by the L E I C A in white on the front. It's the same as N i k o n I had for years, and to be honest, the EVF hump with nothing on it (shown above) looks worse to my eye. It's a Leica. What do I care if people see what it's called. It's no different to Sony, Canon, Fuji or any of the opposition. Granted, the M cameras look better without the red dot and with the traditional script (to me). But on the SL, neither the name nor the red dot bother me in the slightest, and with the name taped over, it just looks odd. I agree … thus peeled the tape off. dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.