Jump to content

Should Leica Replace the M with the SL?


barjohn

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

There will likely always be a place for a Leica RF camera regardless of whatever Leica FF mirrorless AF cameras are announced. A friend currently travelling in Cambodia to photograph temples has been forced by the local 'mafia' to apply for a licence / permit costing $500 covering just a few days use in one location in order to use his 'professional' Nikon D810 and LF plate camera and tripod. He sent me the following message:

 

"Yes your Leica friends would have no problems with their discrete cameras. Yes the humidity is a real killer! I've been climbing up & down mountains all day with it today. As soon as I put my head under the dark cloth it's like a sauna, I've photographed in easier places, but the locations are stunning. My guide has been really helpful in carrying some equipment for me but did not volunteer to carry my large format bag today …" 

 

​They do not like 'professional' photographers. They probably do not realise that a discrete Leica RF is capable of professional results without using a tripod. Leica RF cameras are the sensible choice for 'lightweight discrete photography'. 

 

dunk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

​They do not like 'professional' photographers. They probably do not realise that a discrete Leica RF is capable of professional results without using a tripod. Leica RF cameras are the sensible choice for 'lightweight discrete photography'. 

 

dunk

I'm sure they love them. They can make money out of them. :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...