steve70 Posted December 10, 2015 Share #21 Posted December 10, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Just received my new Q yesterday, my exp. comp. dial works in both over or under exp. comp. and is noticible oin the finder in the "A" mode. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 10, 2015 Posted December 10, 2015 Hi steve70, Take a look here Exposure compensation preview & AEL/AFL metering memory lock problems. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
JLoh Posted January 8, 2016 Share #22 Posted January 8, 2016 I've experienced the same exposure compensation issue as others. Live preview shows on negative adjustments, not positive. Have reset camera, removed battery and card, etc. several times, and the problem remains. Just checked firmware version and confirmed I have 1.1. Any suggestions about how to fix the problem? Thank you in advance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KLManhattan Posted January 8, 2016 Share #23 Posted January 8, 2016 Just tested exposure compensation on my Q and both the EVF and the rear screen show the effects of both negative and positive exposure compensation. I tested this in aperture priority mode only. I wonder if this problem is only with the earlier manufactured Q's. Leica may have found the problem and corrected it, but failed to notify previous buyers. My Q was manufactured on 11/11/2015. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerjer Posted January 8, 2016 Share #24 Posted January 8, 2016 Just tested exposure compensation on my Q and both the EVF and the rear screen show the effects of both negative and positive exposure compensation. I tested this in aperture priority mode only. I wonder if this problem is only with the earlier manufactured Q's. Leica may have found the problem and corrected it, but failed to notify previous buyers. My Q was manufactured on 11/11/2015. Have you tried this in low light environment with no high luminosity part in the frame? I only have this problem in these conditions. No problem in daylight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamuelF Posted January 8, 2016 Share #25 Posted January 8, 2016 I also just tested on my Q and only have this problem in dim light conditions on EVF and LCD. I also have noticed that in very dim light conditions and manual focus mode the magnificated image is darker in comparison to the unmagnified image. I think that in order to keep a noise free image at a high frame rate in the display the camera has to reduce the luminosity, and hence prevents the preview of an overexposed image that would require either a display ISO increase, or frame rate decrease. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadohead Posted January 8, 2016 Share #26 Posted January 8, 2016 I think there's a threshold beyond which the camera cannot display simulated overexposure; it's not a bug, the camera simply can't amplify the image on the LCD/EVF any more. You can easily find different lighting conditions where the Exposure Compensation will display at maximum +3 or +2 or +1 Exp Comp, but then in very low light levels won't display any at all simply because it can't amplify the signal. This is easily demonstrable; I'm in a room with a light well, it is late in the day. If I point the camera toward the light well, I can dial in +3 and it displays as expected. If I point the camera in the middle of the room, away from the well, I can dial in +1 or a little more and have it display. After +1 or so the display won't change, but the resulting image will be overexposed as expected. If I point the camera toward the far end of the room, where it is dimmest, I can't dial in overexposure simulation at all, but the resulting photo will show the overexposure. This seems to be a hardware limitation; I don't see it getting "fixed." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadohead Posted January 8, 2016 Share #27 Posted January 8, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) I just went back and measured the areas in my test in case anyone wanted to try it for themselves. The light well with +3 exp comp availble is 7 EV, the middle area with +1 exp comp available is 4.5 EV, and the dim area with +0 exp comp is 3 EV. I think the camera gets below 4 or 3.5 EV and all bets are off. Changing the ISO or shutter speed has no function; it's strictly the circuitry in the data pipe. That's my theory, anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KLManhattan Posted January 9, 2016 Share #28 Posted January 9, 2016 Have you tried this in low light environment with no high luminosity part in the frame? I only have this problem in these conditions. No problem in daylight. Have not tried this in low light, but will do that and report on the results. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KLManhattan Posted January 9, 2016 Share #29 Posted January 9, 2016 Have not tried this in low light, but will do that and report on the results. Just tried it and found that in dim lighting conditions the EVF and LCD do not reflect the results of exposure compensation the same way they do in daylight, but the actual pictures do reflect the exposure compensation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen55 Posted January 10, 2016 Author Share #30 Posted January 10, 2016 The concensus on this issue seems to be that there is a problem with the Q previewing over exposure on the LCD & EVF in poor light. I cannot accept that a camera at this price point should have such an issue when the camera I am upgrading from, at a third of the price (a Fuji X100s) has no problems whatsoever previewing over exposure in all lighting conditions. I do consider this to be a fault and will try to contact Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeheung Posted August 1, 2016 Share #31 Posted August 1, 2016 I believe under firmware 2.0, we can preview over-exposure on the LCD when turning the Exposure Compensation dial to the + number. Does anyone notice this? ( this did not work on firmware 1.1 ). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big T Posted August 2, 2016 Share #32 Posted August 2, 2016 Just tried it and found that in dim lighting conditions the EVF and LCD do not reflect the results of exposure compensation the same way they do in daylight, but the actual pictures do reflect the exposure compensation. Ditto. 10 month old Q with V2.0 firmware. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.