Jump to content

Picking a film scanner... What a pickle


Ozoyo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Indeed, but sharing over the Internet is problematic without some way of digitising, it does not exclude "wet" printing but seems to provoke more discussion.

Rarely these days are the respective merits of enlargers discussed, unfortunately. I do not incur the high costs of inkjet printing as my V35 doesn't seem to need them ;)  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nearly all of my B&W stuff on my Flickr is from the Plustek 7600 - which I think is almost the same as the 8200.  I save the files as Tiff DNG (scanned as raw, 3600 setting) format as everything goes into Lightroom and is inverted there.  Makes management very easy.  Here are a few examples.  I'm extremely happy with the results, I just wish it was slightly faster.  I REALLY wish I would of picked up a Pakon 135+ back when they were $250...

 

 

22981953146_d7cb076068_c.jpgroll30-34.jpg by jkjod, on Flickr

 

22981897996_6ff842dc32_c.jpgroll30-8.jpg by jkjod, on Flickr

 

21997154635_b3ec34963c_c.jpgacros100trip2015-26.jpg by jkjod, on Flickr

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think about a darkroom.  Tons more fun than a scanner.

 

As I indicated in my post above above this not a mutually exclusive choice, I run both. It's just that there is more discussion about scanners these days.

I do applaud your efforts to convert those who have not yet seen the light (fully intended pun).

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As I indicated in my post above above this not a mutually exclusive choice, I run both. It's just that there is more discussion about scanners these days.

I do applaud your efforts to convert those who have not yet seen the light (fully intended pun).

 

OK let us start a thread about the enlarger and darkroom then. E.g. how to make prints in a few square meters only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call me odd, but I like scanning. Like all dark arts (and darkroom would also be one), it's troublesome and frustrating until one gets it right, but then it's fun. 

 

This is a very nice photo, I think.

 

Nearly all of my B&W stuff on my Flickr is from the Plustek 7600 - which I think is almost the same as the 8200.  I save the files as Tiff DNG (scanned as raw, 3600 setting) format as everything goes into Lightroom and is inverted there.  Makes management very easy.  Here are a few examples.  I'm extremely happy with the results, I just wish it was slightly faster.  I REALLY wish I would of picked up a Pakon 135+ back when they were $250...

 

 

22981953146_d7cb076068_c.jpgroll30-34.jpg by jkjod, on Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call me odd, but I like scanning. Like all dark arts (and darkroom would also be one), it's troublesome and frustrating until one gets it right, but then it's fun. 

I have to agree - scanning can be fun and isn't boring at all. I expect that one day I will be absolutely perfect at it and then it will be boring, but I haven't got there yet!

 

Mind you, there is a compromise position that incorporates the best of both wet and dry print processes: shoot paper negatives, develop them in a tray under a safelight, then scan them. It's like having a scanner that smells of fixer, the ultimate photographic pleasure.  :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...