msshea Posted February 1, 2015 Share #1 Posted February 1, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi All, I bought an R 19mm v.2 a number of years ago to use with various EOS bodies and was quite happy with it. Using it on my 240, it seems a bit soft. I haven't done an exhaustive test to determine the ideal f stop, but I usually work between f/5.6 and f/11. I can improve things a bit using Nik Output Sharpener, but sometimes I don't like the results. Considering the lens's vintage, I guess this isn't surprising. I'm wondering if anyone has experience comparing it to either the Leica or Zeiss 18mm. Thanks, Merrill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 1, 2015 Posted February 1, 2015 Hi msshea, Take a look here R 19mm v.2 compared to M 18mm?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
a911s Posted February 1, 2015 Share #2 Posted February 1, 2015 I've only had the Leica R 19mm V1 and the Zeiss for M 18mm. The rangefinder was better. I'm going to guess it will be better for the Leica 19mm V2 vs. Leica M 18mm shoot out as well. But I'm ready to be surprised. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.