paragon Posted May 10, 2007 Share #1 Posted May 10, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Please excuse this question, but Is 2.8 twice 5.6 and if so - Is there any reason to believe that 2.8 @1/125 with a 200ASA film is NOT the same as 5.6 @ 1/125 with a 400ASA film - if you see what i mean - or is it all a lot more complicated? (apart from DOF and grain - that is) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 Hi paragon, Take a look here Film Speed/ShutterSpeed/F stop. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
andybarton Posted May 10, 2007 Share #2 Posted May 10, 2007 Those two scenario will give you the same exposure. The halving of the light hitting the film due to the smaller aperture is compensated for by the doubling of the film speed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paragon Posted May 10, 2007 Author Share #3 Posted May 10, 2007 Andy That's what I thought but taking the first point The aperture at 1.4 on my Nikor S 5cm/1.4 looks a lot bigger than twice 2.8 The same looking at the f2.8 verus f5.6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted May 10, 2007 Share #4 Posted May 10, 2007 Please excuse this question, but Is 2.8 twice 5.6 and if so - Is there any reason to believe that 2.8 @1/125 with a 200ASA film is NOT the same as 5.6 @ 1/125 with a 400ASA film) No they're not the same, Andy's wrong I'm afraid. If you shoot at f2.8 with a 200 film the aperture will be f4 when you shoot a 400 film with the same shutter speed. Doubling the aperture number lets in a quarter of the light, not half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfgilbert Posted May 10, 2007 Share #5 Posted May 10, 2007 Aperture (f stop) is the ratio of the focal length to the diameter of the diaphragm. The amount of light captured is proportional to the surface of the opening, so it is proportional to the square of the diameter of the opening. That's why f stops are graduated in multiples of the square root of 2, i.e. 1.4. Each f-stop divides the diameter by 1.4, thus the surface by 2, and the amount of light by 2. So, 2 to 2.8 = half the light. 2.8 to 4 = half the light again, etc. Equivalent exposures for the same speed would be f2 at ISO 100 or f2.8 at ISO 200 or f4 at ISO 400, etc. Or, for the same ISO, f2.8 at 1/500s = f4 at 1/250s = f5.6 at 1/125th, etc. Hope that answers your question. Jacques Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
budrichard Posted May 10, 2007 Share #6 Posted May 10, 2007 To make it simple, you need to memorise the f stops, 1.0, 1.4, 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, 5.6, 8.0, 11, 16, 22, 32. 64 if I remember correctly. Each change is either 1/2 the light or 2 twice the light depending on whether you open or close the diaphragm. Shutter speeds are usually marked to give either 1/2 or twice the exposure depending on whether you set a slower or faster speed. Once you know one correct exposure, the rest is easy. Your example of 2.8 at 1/125 with ASA 200, would translate to 4.0 at 1/125 for ASA 400 because the film is twice as sensitive, therefore you need half the light or 1 stop down, i.e. f4.0. -Dick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paragon Posted May 10, 2007 Author Share #7 Posted May 10, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) To make it simple, you need to memorise the f stops, 1.0, 1.4, 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, 5.6, 8.0, 11, 16, 22, 32. 64 if I remember correctly. Each change is either 1/2 the light or 2 twice the light depending on whether you open or close the diaphragm. Shutter speeds are usually marked to give either 1/2 or twice the exposure depending on whether you set a slower or faster speed. Once you know one correct exposure, the rest is easy. Your example of 2.8 at 1/125 with ASA 200, would translate to 4.0 at 1/125 for ASA 400 because the film is twice as sensitive, therefore you need half the light or 1 stop down, i.e. f4.0. -Dick Thanks Dick - that's easier BUT thanks Jacques for the more technical stuff "throwing the meter out" is taking me back to the 70s Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.