Jump to content

Rob's Tri-x


Guest stnami

Recommended Posts

x

LOL

 

But you know, for me personally, it (film) is more alive than it ever was.

 

Right now I'm scanning hundreds of 30 year-old negatives.

 

Photo's I made when I was 16.

 

The memories and the moments that come back to life...

 

So brilliant and vivid.

 

In colour and in balack and white

 

At the moment I'm waiting for a new MP to arrive...

 

Did a test last week; M8 @ 320 vs Kodak 400 Tmax... The outcome:

 

Both so different, and both so usefull to everyone who wants to express her/himself with photography.

 

It's aliiiiiiiiiiiiive

 

Cheers,

 

Peter

 

http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00L1PP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you share some of the images that you did to compare M8 vs Tmax400? Woudl be very interesting to see.

 

Thank you

 

Tilman

 

Not very scientific...

 

Tmax 400...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you share some of the images that you did to compare M8 vs Tmax400? Woudl be very interesting to see.

 

Thank you

 

Tilman

 

Not very scientific...

 

M8 @ 320...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Could you share some of the images that you did to compare M8 vs Tmax400? Woudl be very interesting to see.

 

Thank you

 

Tilman

 

Not very scientific...

 

Please don't start...

 

The only conclusion I draw from this, is that I like grain...

 

And also that the M8 files are amazing...

 

Cheers,

 

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the grain and DOF perhaps in combination with OOF that provides any image with "it" digital images look so perfect, so boring, so nothing .....

 

I don't have the M8 but a D5 .... and although the total imagary is good it just doesn't contain Atmosphere and character....

 

Perfection is always boring ..... and always has been, and always will be

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the grain and DOF perhaps in combination with OOF that provides any image with "it" digital images look so perfect, so boring, so nothing .....

 

I don't have the M8 but a D5 .... and although the total imagary is good it just doesn't contain Atmosphere and character....

 

Perfection is always boring ..... and always has been, and always will be

 

I see your point Johannes,

 

you know, it's just different horses for different courses...

 

I like both film and the M8.

 

For instance, my wife likes to have her portrait taken with the M8. And so do her female friends.

The guys who I call my friends like their portraits grainy...

 

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

yawn.............. must be the migrane again, drinking too many smoothies

 

LOL Again...

 

Sorry to hijack your otherwise interesting thread; just wanted to give polite answers. :)

 

BTW, saw your website... Outstanding, sir!

 

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest stnami

Thanks.........I just feel that the film/digital comparative saga should be treated as light humour. Taking it further is like using bleach to clean a Dalmatian:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...