Ecaton Posted September 30, 2013 Share #41  Posted September 30, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am surprised that you can take seriously a review or comment noting that the f4.2 (FF equiv) Coolpix A "beats" the M with the f2 28mm lens  BTW I can find people who say the earth is flat ....  LOL, why are all XV owners so emotional? A conclusion that the RX1 with its f2 35mm Sonnar on the other hand gets bettered by the XV f 6 or something or how much again (FF equiv.) on the other hand is perfectly fine. Wonderful, I love it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 30, 2013 Posted September 30, 2013 Hi Ecaton, Take a look here Puts' review of the X Vario. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
colonel Posted September 30, 2013 Share #42 Â Posted September 30, 2013 LOL, why are all XV owners so emotional? A conclusion that the RX1 with its f2 35mm Sonnar on the other hand gets bettered by the XV f 6 or something or how much again (FF equiv.) on the other hand is perfectly fine. Wonderful, I love it. Â If you had read above, you would see I clearly said that I do not agree comparing the x Vario with the RX1. I have been completely consistent. Â That comment in the cool pix review you quoted is certainly nonsense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest badbob Posted September 30, 2013 Share #43 Â Posted September 30, 2013 LOL, why are all XV owners so emotional? A conclusion that the RX1 with its f2 35mm Sonnar on the other hand gets bettered by the XV f 6 or something or how much again (FF equiv.) on the other hand is perfectly fine. Wonderful, I love it. Â If you or anyone consider Sony, Ricoh et al to be comparable to or even better than the XV, then why the heck are you looking at this $3000 camera? That requires an explanation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.