Ecaton Posted September 30, 2013 Share #41 Posted September 30, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am surprised that you can take seriously a review or comment noting that the f4.2 (FF equiv) Coolpix A "beats" the M with the f2 28mm lens BTW I can find people who say the earth is flat .... LOL, why are all XV owners so emotional? A conclusion that the RX1 with its f2 35mm Sonnar on the other hand gets bettered by the XV f 6 or something or how much again (FF equiv.) on the other hand is perfectly fine. Wonderful, I love it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 30, 2013 Posted September 30, 2013 Hi Ecaton, Take a look here Puts' review of the X Vario. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
colonel Posted September 30, 2013 Share #42 Posted September 30, 2013 LOL, why are all XV owners so emotional? A conclusion that the RX1 with its f2 35mm Sonnar on the other hand gets bettered by the XV f 6 or something or how much again (FF equiv.) on the other hand is perfectly fine. Wonderful, I love it. If you had read above, you would see I clearly said that I do not agree comparing the x Vario with the RX1. I have been completely consistent. That comment in the cool pix review you quoted is certainly nonsense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest badbob Posted September 30, 2013 Share #43 Posted September 30, 2013 LOL, why are all XV owners so emotional? A conclusion that the RX1 with its f2 35mm Sonnar on the other hand gets bettered by the XV f 6 or something or how much again (FF equiv.) on the other hand is perfectly fine. Wonderful, I love it. If you or anyone consider Sony, Ricoh et al to be comparable to or even better than the XV, then why the heck are you looking at this $3000 camera? That requires an explanation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.