bocaburger Posted November 17, 2015 Share #41 Posted November 17, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Neither of my M240's has flickering framelines (yet), but in any light level they are perennially too bright. (I don't mean they don't adapt, I mean despite it they are too bright). IMO the LED frame lighting was a case of fixing what ain't broken, adding complexity and therefore failure potential to a simple, non-moving non-electronic system that worked flawlessly for 50+ years well into the digital age and in no way needed changing or benefitted from it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 17, 2015 Posted November 17, 2015 Hi bocaburger, Take a look here M240 framelines 'flickering'?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Steve Ricoh Posted November 17, 2015 Share #42 Posted November 17, 2015 Neither of my M240's has flickering framelines (yet), but in any light level they are perennially too bright. (I don't mean they don't adapt, I mean despite it they are too bright). IMO the LED frame lighting was a case of fixing what ain't broken, adding complexity and therefore failure potential to a simple, non-moving non-electronic system that worked flawlessly for 50+ years well into the digital age and in no way needed changing or benefitted from it. Totally agree, why fix something not broken! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeralCoton Posted November 18, 2015 Share #43 Posted November 18, 2015 You're both wrong. The central patch and framelines move together as a unit because the projected image is moved (and inverted) by a converging lens just before the pentaprism assembly I thought that was what I said. It all moves as you focus. It is odd when you first notice it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.