Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, Doc Henry said:

It's beautiful Neil , superb vanishing line and nice black and grey tone

Best H

The "Cans Worms"  as said one person here of this thread who loves film

Thank you Henry.....really appreciate it

 

Neil

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 15 Stunden schrieb Suede:

Walking up to La Tournette. [Agfa Vista 400]

What a wonderful landscape! I am ever again impressed by such mountains, which is easily done, as I live in an area where the highest hills measure 100 m above seal level at maximum.  It is nice to have the persons in the frame, as they give a scale to the viewer.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sahart, Northwestern Sahara, Morocco by _JM_, on Flickr

Velvia 50 - Horizon S3

Edited by JMF
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

14 hours ago, A miller said:

very nice, Antonio!  Love that second one in particular 

Thanks, Adam. I might go there again with a MF camera and a roll of Pan F.

14 hours ago, gbealnz said:

An amazing place Matera Antonio, amazing. The 6x7 looks fine too, couldn't see the banding you mention.

Gary

Yes, Matera is a unique place. As far as the 67, this particular negative does not present the issue. 

13 hours ago, NW67 said:

Very nice mate

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

14 hours ago, Doc Henry said:

Kodak Portra 800-Leica M7-35 Summilux Asph

Portra dev and scan home lab

....  may be the tittle  for Ernest Rog  is "quadriptich"  ?

Best

H.

 So glad to see that you are venturing into the mindset of diptych, Doc Henry.  You are right on track, since a four-part work would be called quadriptych.  These are awesome colors in this composition, but to make it a four-part work, you would have to separate the subject into four separate images.  I prefer to call any work with more than three separate images a polyptych. It is easier than following the online definition for each multi-part work.

“Specifically, a "diptych" is a two-part work of art; a "triptych" is a three-part work; a tetraptych or quadriptych has four parts; pentaptych five; hexaptych six; heptaptych (or septych in Latin) seven; and octaptych eight parts.”

 Ralph Gibson goes so far as to define a joined diptych as a “tableau.”  Robert Rauschenberg’s definition of a multi-part work is “combine,”  which he innovated when he was studying with Josef Albers.  I use the term “color field construct,”  since it leaves the “field” wide open.  This way, I can construct a work with abstract color as well as identifiable image panels. 

Talk about “a can of worms,” I love your moniker handle!

 cheers, Rog 🎬

(Now it is about that fifth stool that is turned upside down.)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Black-and-White
Nikon F Micro-Nikkor 55mm
Tri-X (rescued over 40 years old)
M-A APO-Summicron-M 50mm
ADOX Color Implosion

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Ernest said:

Bet on Alpha
M-A APO-Summicron-M 50mm
Ektachrome E100
Nikon F Micro-Nikkor 55mm
ADOX Color Implosion

A study in elementals: color fields and vintage wooden letterpress.

 

Very cool, Rog.  That green is signature Adox :)

20 hours ago, Doc Henry said:

Kodak Portra 800-Leica M7-35 Summilux Asph

Portra dev and scan home lab

....  may be the tittle  for Ernest Rog  is "quadriptich"  ?

 

Best

H.

Beautiful, Henry

6 hours ago, benqui said:

M6, Ilford Delta 400, 90 Apo-Summicron

 

Another stunner, Marc.  I'll have whatever she's having 😄

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, A miller said:

stunning, Wayne.  Is that 35mm?  Looks like large format....

Yes. 35mm. I was floored when I first saw the scan. You should see it before the forum software gets a hold of it. You can see each individual stone in the barn foundation. The lens is a Zeiss 38/2.8 Sonnar. What will really surprise you is that the camera is no larger than an Olympus XA.........Shirt pocket size.

Thanks for the comment.

Best,

Wayne

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wayne said:

Yes. 35mm. I was floored when I first saw the scan. You should see it before the forum software gets a hold of it. You can see each individual stone in the barn foundation. The lens is a Zeiss 38/2.8 Sonnar. What will really surprise you is that the camera is no larger than an Olympus XA.........Shirt pocket size.

Thanks for the comment.

Best,

Wayne

wowzer - really impressive

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...