Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hey Steve - Glad the rolls are working out for you.  Better in your hands than mine :)  

just some random shots, none particularly great BUT .... these were shot with Cinestill 800 +82B balancing filter (brings it to daylight) and 2xND filter (read somewhere online that cinematographers like that combo, so I figured, why not try it .... film courtesy of Adam (yes 800 made from US to London back to US with x-ray damage (luggage screened to bring on board, not checked). ...

 

Very cool, Phil.  I guess the lens has somewhat of a built-in (light) yellow filter?

This photo is made with a very special lens: the Canon 35mm f2 SC lens from 1971. The elements of this lens have a yellow-brown appearance due to thorium used in the glass. Thorium (apparently) is a radioactive material and, with time, the activity of the element somehow causes the colouration of the elements.

 

Anyway, I love the properties of this lens for black and white photography. Some people "clear up" the yellowing by exposing the lens to strong lights for several weeks, but I value too much the effect it gives b&w film. The lens also gives crazily and unusually detailed pictures - it may not show here, but those highlights have abundant details, as do the deepest shadows:

 

p414333105-5.jpg

Port Phillip Bay, 2012

Canon A1, FD 35mm f2 SC, Ilford FP4+

 

Very nice, Neil.  Love the composition.  What camera?

One to get us going

Across 100

6x6

Developed in Ilfordtec LC29

Cameron Highlands Tea Plantation

 

LOVE these colors!!!  And agree with Philip that you are giving Henry a run for his money LOL

Pink Poppies - Portra 400 - Elmarit M 90

 

Funny statement and great natural colors.

Some light-hearted humour in the morning.

 

34365308363_ce5d822a92_b.jpg

Flickr

203FE 80 Planar Provia 100

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Ian - I am loving your premium color film stock photos.  Both pleasing to my eyes....and validating to my ego...Just a pleasure to view.  Thanks for sharing :) 

Common Blue (Polyommatus icarus). Portra 400 and 90 Macro Elmar-M.

 

35258540096_7a5cbf723e_b.jpg

 

 

Great picture Adam in full inspiration our man

Best

Henry

 

Gorgeous, Philip, except that I think a shot out needs to go to the Planar lens...and also your skills at using your tubes.

Here's some Ektar for all Ektar lovers.

 

I felt a bit bored on Monday night so put together a first draft of an article about extension tubes.

 

35194571656_85258fca43_b.jpg

Flickr

80 Planar with tubes handheld

 

Much better, Neil.  Let's analyze:

-The Tri-X is MUCH better than the Across.  Please make a note of this.  Has nothing to do with my "Make America Great Again" bandwagon, although I think you probably would take a seat in that. :)

-The shadow detail in the 8x10 in the foreground is significantly better.  This is obvious.  The 6x6 is plenty sufficient.  But the 8x10 gives the over-the-top detail and tonal range in the dark EVs.  Definitely worth the extra effort for silver gelatin prints.  

-Having said the above, I don't see the same advantage with the highlights.  In both images, the highlights seem blown and the detail in the highlights seems to have been obtained through straining the negative.    I would expect to see this with the 6x6 given the good shadow detail (and assumed no use of an ND grad filter).  But with the 8x10 I'd expect to see a creamy noise-free range of light tones, similar to the the dark tones in the foreground.  This suggests to me that you may have over exposed the shot.  Can you use an ND grad filter on your 8x10?  If so, I think a 2-stop medium grad could have gotten you those creamy noise free light tones the sky and clouds.

Heres another one of the Tea Plantation except this one is with the Chamonix 8x10..........I'm hoping this will make a nice contact print

Trix320 8x10

f64

2 minutes and 15 seconds exposure

Devoured in D-76

Right on sunrise

 

Very nice.  What camera and lens?

A couple of our bedroom in the Cameron Hills Lake View Hotel

Across 100 6x6

ilfotec L29

 

Very nice colors and view!

Firenze

 

MP-35LA-160 portra

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

I don't have a ND for the 8x10. I have one for the 6x6 but didn't use it...........I also only have a round ND for the 6x6 not a NDG

I know for a fact that the contact print will look better, I will make one tomorrow.

Looking at the neg its not over exposed, digitising the neg probably gives it that look............

I'm just going to shoot Leica S and SL for a while...........well for the rest of my time off :) :) :)

I still have a few pictures to post and will post them tomorrow.

Below is a river shot that is defiantly over exposed as I screwed up on the ND filter compensation :(

 

Neil

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a ND for the 8x10. I have one for the 6x6 but didn't use it...........I also only have a round ND for the 6x6 not a NDG

I know for a fact that the contact print will look better, I will make one tomorrow.

Looking at the neg its not over exposed, digitising the neg probably gives it that look............

I'm just going to shoot Leica S and SL for a while...........well for the rest of my time off :) :) :)

I still have a few pictures to post and will post them tomorrow.

Below is a river shot that is defiantly over exposed as I screwed up on the ND filter compensation :(

 

Neil

 

Very nice framing and rendering :)

Kodak TX Neil ?

Henry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Common Blue (Polyommatus icarus). Portra 400 and 90 Macro Elmar-M.

 

35258540096_7a5cbf723e_b.jpg

Thank you for the spectacular photograph. That is one splendid insect. I have been carrying the 90 Elmar Collapsible around for about a month now. It has proven to be a very fun lens. I think I will start shopping for a 90 Macro-Elmar. Do you find you use the adapter frequenty? It sounds like a bit of a PIA. I do use the close-up ocular on my 50 DR, but it does not require removal of lens. Is the extra .2M close focus that critical..........in practical use? Did you use the adapter for this photo?

Edited by Wayne
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like a bit of a PIA. ....Is the extra .2M close focus that critical..........in practical use? Did you use the adapter for this photo?

 

 

The restricted focussing range with the adapter is a PITA but it is pretty essential if you want to photograph something as small as a butterfly (you will probably get away without the goggles for one of your Monarch butterflies :D but a Common Blue isn't much larger than a thumbnail).

 

The main selling point of the Macro Elmar-M is IMO its portable size. Both the lens and adaptor fit easily into a small bag and that is the most important feature for me. If it wasn't for that (or the fact that I already own the lens) I wouldn't consider buying the lens – certainly not new (it is one of only two lenses I've bought used). If portability isn't so important, there are far better options for significantly less cost. For example, you could buy a brand new Nikon F6 and the superlative 105/F2.8 VR for less than the cost of the ME-M new.

Edited by wattsy
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

After color , some black and white street photos (SP) with one of my favorite films  :)

with very nice grain, and with my Leica Monochrom MP  :)

 

 

Kodak TX400-Leica MP-35 Summilux Asph

 

SP Paris

 

attachicon.gifImage4bergeseinekodtxmplfht+++-1000.jpg

 

SP Montelimar (South France)

You like cheese ?  :)

 

attachicon.gifImage7fromagkodtx400mplfht+++1000.jpg

 

 

 

Ilford HP5 400 Isos-Leica MP-28 Summicron Asph

 

SP Marseille (South France)

 

attachicon.gifImage11msllehp5mpseflfht+++1000.jpg

 

Best

Henry

Love the first one!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Back to one of my favorite spots for a sunrise... :)

 

SWC, Ektar  :wub:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by A miller
  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the spectacular photograph. That is one splendid insect. I have been carrying the 90 Elmar Collapsible around for about a month now. It has proven to be a very fun lens. I think I will start shopping for a 90 Macro-Elmar. Do you find you use the adapter frequenty? It sounds like a bit of a PIA. I do use the close-up ocular on my 50 DR, but it does not require removal of lens. Is the extra .2M close focus that critical..........in practical use? Did you use the adapter for this photo?

 

The restricted focussing range with the adapter is a PITA but it is pretty essential if you want to photograph something as small as a butterfly (you will probably get away without the goggles for one of your Monarch butterflies :D but a Common Blue isn't much larger than a thumbnail).

 

The main selling point of the Macro Elmar-M is IMO its portable size. Both the lens and adaptor fit easily into a small bag and that is the most important feature for me. If it wasn't for that (or the fact that I already own the lens) I wouldn't consider buying the lens – certainly not new (it is one of only two lenses I've bought used). If portability isn't so important, there are far better options for significantly less cost. For example, you could buy a brand new Nikon F6 and the superlative 105/F2.8 VR for less than the cost of the ME-M new.

 

 

Wayne I agree with Ian. For macrophoto like Ian butterfly you can use the ME90 with his macroadapter

but for a real macrophoto you can use a  SLR Nikon or another brand Canon with a macro lens. I use now

both M and SLR according to the type of picture.

 

Here my M7 mounted with his Macro Elmar 90 and his macroadapter

the advantage and it's important , the ME90 is very light and compact and you can

use as a tele without the macro adapter

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

M8-Summilux 50 Asph

 

Rg Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Philip.  I have been working this scene more   :)

 

I think this is one of the best from this location. Definitely well worth the effort.

Edited by A miller
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice framing and color , soft and pleasant to watch :)

I like the "soft" edge and lines of the flower , not hypersharp

like in digital,  , unsightly and contrary to what is seen in the nature

You already know I love poppies.

Thank you SS for posting. :)

Have you more ?

Best

Henry

 

Thank you Henry, I do have a few more from that evening, however I am not sure they are worthy of posting! I haven't used the 90 that much on my M, focus is a bit tricky for me. I need to shoot with it more often!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...