Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Yea yea!  I'll get there.

 

Are you happy with it's handling and focusing?

Obviously the lens is not a point of contention here.

 

Mark

 

Thumbs up on the handling.  Great IQ.

It has vey good manual focus IQ, but the shutter doesn't advance instantaneously and instead the lens need to zip in focus position first.  Annoying for really quick shooting but par for the course as far as these little compact film cameras go (except for the Oly XA series, which btw I just received a sealed in box XA-4 to play with :) )

The auto focus is pretty good.  I am sobering up to the fact that there is just isn't anything like a rangefinder....

BUT YOU STILL NEED ONE OF THESE

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Gary, Eoin.  Great results with an unconventional focal length.  Well done.  Nice to see you again and hope all is ok and you haven't been shooting too much digital - the radiation isn't good for you, you know....  :ph34r:

I've been away for a bit, and haven't had a chance to develop any of my exposed films until today (when I worked out that my remaining fixer appears foobarred). It's good to see that The Thread has been as busy as ever.

 

SWC w/ Tri-X at Aussie National Track Champ's in Brisbane...

33124882280_e1d40950f1_b.jpgB001 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr

 

33508629045_c044a5d530_b.jpgB002 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr

 

Very lovely, as usual, Chris.  What film?  

Back to 35mm for some orchids.

33515602765_ccd7b00dc2_c.jpg

Orchids 5 by chrism229, on Flickr

 

33131930700_fbce5efce5_c.jpg

Orchids 4 by chrism229, on Flickr

 

33131857500_f19bff9e6e_c.jpg

Orchids 3 by chrism229, on Flickr

 

The last one is from a full resolution .fff scan, and shows just how much detail there is in these tiny ( :o ) negatives!

 

Chris

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another from the Minolta TC-1 with Portra 400

NYC (of course)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

And another from the recent snow blizzard...

The challenge of hailing a taxi in these conditions...

 

M7, 28mm elmarit pre asph Portra 400

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Gary, Eoin.  Great results with an unconventional focal length.  Well done.  Nice to see you again and hope all is ok and you haven't been shooting too much digital - the radiation isn't good for you, you know....  :ph34r:

Hi, Adam.

It's great to be back. I've been too busy to shoot anything much at all (although I did take my Monochrom to Thailand, Malaysian Borneo, and Brunei last week, totaling about 20 clicks).

The SWC is such a joy to use, it encourages delving into the ridiculous - My natural habitat.

 

I'm very much liking your immersion in the 35mm compact market. Keep it up!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

A few more from the same roll. Hope nobody minds the rather gruesome theme; this is nature after all, messy, brutal and beautiful.

 

I'm putting together an album of lion "portraits" taken in 2005 for my soon-to-be-relaunched site. More snaps than anything else but still fun to go through old photos.

 

200/2.8 2X

What a series, Philip! Like Adam, the last one is particularly catching - Contentment in a sea of red.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Adam.

It's great to be back. I've been too busy to shoot anything much at all (although I did take my Monochrom to Thailand, Malaysian Borneo, and Brunei last week, totaling about 20 clicks).

The SWC is such a joy to use, it encourages delving into the ridiculous - My natural habitat.

 

I'm very much liking your immersion in the 35mm compact market. Keep it up!

 

Very interesting, Eoin.  

Speaking of delving into the ridiculous, I also just received this old Nikon "action touch" waterproof 35mm film camera from Japan....

I am totally psyched!  Hope it works!  The possibilities are endless (heavy rain, snow, pool, beach...)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica M3, Zeiss 50mm f/2 Planar, Ilford FP4, Kodak D76

 

33391660621_88b799955c_b.jpg

Untitled by Brendan | Toews, on Flickr

 

 

 

Leica M3, Zeiss 50mm f/2 Planar, Ilford HP5 @ 1600, Kodak D76

 

33520387735_67461138ca_b.jpg

Untitled by Brendan | Toews, on Flickr

 

 

 

Leica M4-P, Zeiss 28mm f/2.8 Biogon, Ilford Delta 100, Kodak D76

 

32676283934_431ff0529d_b.jpg

Untitled by Brendan | Toews, on Flickr

 

 

 

Yashica Mat 124G, Ilford HP5

 

32705566633_67e7e1c95b_b.jpg

Untitled by Brendan | Toews, on Flickr

  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting, Eoin.  

Speaking of delving into the ridiculous, I also just received this old Nikon "action touch" waterproof 35mm film camera from Japan....

I am totally psyched!  Hope it works!  The possibilities are endless (heavy rain, snow, pool, beach...)

Perfect for your next foray to The Dead Sea.

Gary

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Richard.

The square Vs 3:2 is made simpler for me by using the A16 film back, and while I am the first to agree all SWC shots should be square, it gives a bit more miles per gallon, and I find some shots are more suited to a rectangular format.

 

I was possibly trying to rationalize my equipment list for the Europe trip in a few months. I will take the M6 and the 21/35/50, that's a given.

If the SA21 gave me "much the same" sort of view as the SWC, it would allow me to jettison 2 kilos plus of camera weight. Not to mention a heap of weird film.

 

Ultimately though I can see myself taking both/all.

Thanks again

Gary

Practically speaking, Gary, the M6 w/ SA 21mm will do all that you need...but then who are we to err towards the practical?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello !

 

Few snaps I took for a friend the other day at their fashion design studio. 

Shot with Leica CL with dead meter and summicron 40mm. 

Stock : Agfa Vista 200. 

thanks for watching. 

 

tumblr_on1lotEHBP1vjphu4o2_1280.jpg

 

tumblr_on1lotEHBP1vjphu4o5_1280.jpg

 

tumblr_on1lotEHBP1vjphu4o1_1280.jpg

 

tumblr_on1lotEHBP1vjphu4o4_1280.jpg

 

tumblr_on1lotEHBP1vjphu4o6_1280.jpg

 

tumblr_on1lotEHBP1vjphu4o3_1280.jpg

These are awesome Perfect feel for the label.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sobering up to the fact that there is just isn't anything like a rangefinder....

 

 

Yes.

 

I've owned most of the good compacts in the past – T2, T3, Minilux – and whilst they all have good lenses capable of excellent results (image quality simply isn't an issue) none of them can hold a candle to a decent RF camera for inherent usability. You get none of the instinctive control you get with an M rangefinder (it focusses when and where you want it to and the camera fires at exactly the moment you desire) and you get a poky little view of the world to boot. I truly believe that once you become familiar with a Leica M camera, no other "35mm" camera is an adequate substitute.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...