Doc Henry Posted December 3, 2016 Author Share #24541 Posted December 3, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Example from the first film dev'd & scanned by Canadian Film Lab. M7, C-Sonnar 50mm, Portra 160. Early Morning Hiker on the Ridgeway Keith wonderful color and picture H 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 Hi Doc Henry, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Doc Henry Posted December 3, 2016 Author Share #24542 Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) I bought 20 rolls of Kodak TMAX 100 and developed in pure Kodak D76. The general rendering is satisfying not in the TX way but with good definition and nice black grey scale I think Kodak TMAX400 suggested by Philip is in the same manner. I have now 20 rolls for tests ... I will tell you what I think Tam Ky beach at a fishing village at dawn ! Vietnam September 2016 Leica MP-50 Summilux Asph Kodak TMAX100 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry Edited December 3, 2016 by Doc Henry 10 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3160252'>More sharing options...
Keith (M) Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24543 Posted December 3, 2016 Last month I took an early morning walk along the Ridgeway in Wiltshire, armed with GW690II / Velvia 100 and M7 / Portra 160. On a different forum I have seen comments about Velvia and that some people do not like its colours. I know I'm comparing apples & oranges cabbages here (i.e. 6x9 -v- 35mm; transparency -v- negative; different labs; different scanners) but for what it is worth, one image from each combination to see how they compare. In each case I have clicked on 'Auto WB' in LR Dev module. First Velvia then Portra:- Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 10 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3160280'>More sharing options...
gbealnz Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24544 Posted December 3, 2016 Wow, different colours for sure Keith. I'd say that both could possibly stand a bit of colour tweaking, but I am the last to ask/suggest. This is the reason B&W is "simpler". One less thing to worry about. Both are nice. Just different. Gary 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbealnz Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24545 Posted December 3, 2016 A few firsts here. New (to me) Super Angulon 21mm f4. New film, RPX100. First time scanning 35mm with the flatbed Epson. M6. Gary Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 14 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3160298'>More sharing options...
gbealnz Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24546 Posted December 3, 2016 And another. Liking what I see so far. It's different for sure, and I want to compare the SWC with this M6/SA21 setup. Gary Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 14 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3160299'>More sharing options...
Keith (M) Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24547 Posted December 3, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) A few firsts here. New (to me) Super Angulon 21mm f4. New film, RPX100. First time scanning 35mm with the flatbed Epson. M6. Gary Which Epson, Gary? (I have had a V700 for quite a few years). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24548 Posted December 3, 2016 Lisbon - again: 161015_3_MP_0008.jpg MP, 28, Foma400, ns Rgds C. This is my favourite Lisbon shot the dog makes it Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rirakuma Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24549 Posted December 3, 2016 Terrific shot Rocky. Widelux seems like a cool camera. And for being at EI12800 the result is remarkable. What developer was used? br Philip Thanks Phillip! I'll get back to you on that one, I got them done by a lab called blanco negro. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24550 Posted December 3, 2016 Example from the first film dev'd & scanned by Canadian Film Lab. M7, C-Sonnar 50mm, Portra 160. Early Morning Hiker on the Ridgeway How long did it take to get the scans ? I was gutted when I heard they were moving I could walk to their unit from my house in 15 minutes Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbealnz Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24551 Posted December 3, 2016 Which Epson, Gary? (I have had a V700 for quite a few years). An old Perfection 4870 Keith. Cheap as chips, more to "try the flatbed" style, as I have an equally cheap Plustek 8100 for 35mm. I had been "scanning" with a Leica BEOON, but since I now have the 4870, the BEOON has sat untouched. And of course for the M/F stuff (I now also have an SWC), it is a must. Gary 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24552 Posted December 3, 2016 Very nice photos Henry. And look virtually grain-free. My apologies, my post was possibly unclear. Tri-X can certainly be used in low light. The point I made was not concerning low light capabilities; it was about resolution and sheer 'detail-gathering' capabilities. The rather dominant grain of Tri-X (in 135, I hasten to add; Tri-X in 120 is very different different film oddly enough) may give the impression that less detail may have been captured as compared to less grainy films, like T-Max 400, or digital. It's of course only my view. Hi Philip, I bought TMAX 400 recently, I will have to test it but I do not agree in full with you about TXI think it's a film that can be used in places where light is low or almost no light at all , like in the case of Nowherman. Demonstration : Image5cathcandlekodtx400lfht+++950cr.jpg Image6cathrsgirlkodtx400m728cron-Modlufht+++red900.jpg Image6cathlumikodtx400lfht+++-950.jpg Leica M7-Summicron 28 Asph-Kodak TX400 Lens open at f:2 Kodak TX dev. home at 22°C in pure Kodak D76 Rgds H. Great results Gary. RPX100 seems like a film worth trying. And the SA 21 of course. A few firsts here. New (to me) Super Angulon 21mm f4. New film, RPX100. First time scanning 35mm with the flatbed Epson. M6. Gary 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24553 Posted December 3, 2016 Thanks, all for the opinions on the photo. Keith - I agree with in one sense as there is nothing like being there in person but I would also add that I was really disappointed at how muted the low res version that I posted came out. It robs the image of all of the striking details and clarity that are in the full res version, such as the ability to see people on their terraces as well as letters and numbers on the taxi cabs. I have posted this on my flickr page in much larger (though not full) resolution and will keep it there for a day or two in case anyone is interested. Philip - Ha, ha, pay back is a b$tch Seriously, it was this photo that was taken with the lens by NASA in 1969 on the moon (wide open @ 1/250 on Ektachrome) that was the closer for me Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Christoph - Thanks very much. I have been itching for a longer focal length for quite some time now and my old Linhof clunker kit only goes as long as the 180mm Sonar, which is a great lens but on a 6x9 back it is not even an effective 35mm format FL of 80mm. There are so many perspectives of NYC that I want to capture with the longer FLs, so in that sense it will be a pet hobby of mine for the next few months. I also picked up a 500mm APO Tessar from B&H but it had bad lens separation and so I immediately returned it. I would get a lot out of that lens as well. But I will take my time to bond with the Superachromat first. That's a great shot Adam, what an amazing view. I somehow feel that one actually has to be there to appreciate the image. Hard to visualise its full majesty on a flat screen! Adam,Nice, I like the condensed perspective and the long exposure time makes for interesting painting of cars on the roads. Lots of things to see as well, one can almost look into the office windows opposite. I suppose this is the start of a new New York series from you? And did you get the Superachromat for those kind of shots?RgdsC. Very cool Adam. I like it a lot, the light is great and the colours look very accurate, which I guess the lens had something to do with. The lens has really sucked in all the details. Did you have to adjust the verticals? If so you did a great job because it looks completely natural. Now that 250 is on my list, darn. Philip Wonderful shot but take care of you Superb color Adam Best Henry 5 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Christoph - Thanks very much. I have been itching for a longer focal length for quite some time now and my old Linhof clunker kit only goes as long as the 180mm Sonar, which is a great lens but on a 6x9 back it is not even an effective 35mm format FL of 80mm. There are so many perspectives of NYC that I want to capture with the longer FLs, so in that sense it will be a pet hobby of mine for the next few months. I also picked up a 500mm APO Tessar from B&H but it had bad lens separation and so I immediately returned it. I would get a lot out of that lens as well. But I will take my time to bond with the Superachromat first. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3160388'>More sharing options...
A miller Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24554 Posted December 3, 2016 Example from the first film dev'd & scanned by Canadian Film Lab. M7, C-Sonnar 50mm, Portra 160. Early Morning Hiker on the Ridgeway Wow, funky color palette, Keith. But it holds together really well. Almost looks like a lomo film stock of some kind. Very cool. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted December 3, 2016 Share #24555 Posted December 3, 2016 For Dave - Sailing 200 nm out from Carnarvon in the Indian Ocean, we got becalmed, and i took a dip. This is probably a good time to have trustworthy mates, and not to have had a major argument before going over the side (Kodachrome - Canon F1N w/ FD 17mm in Ewa housing)... A001 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr A002 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr A003 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr A004 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr A005 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr very cool, Eoin. I think the first is my favorite. Love those blues and of course the unique POV. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted December 4, 2016 Share #24556 Posted December 4, 2016 And another. Liking what I see so far. It's different for sure, and I want to compare the SWC with this M6/SA21 setup. Gary Excellent, Gary. Good to see. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrism Posted December 4, 2016 Share #24557 Posted December 4, 2016 It's been a long time, but I finally got around to doing some portraits that I had promised this couple back in the summer. 645n, 120/f4, FP4+, HC-110, a strobe, two fill lights and the X1 for the scans. Calora and Keith 3 by chrism229, on Flickr Calora and Keith 2 by chrism229, on Flickr Calora and Keith 1 by chrism229, on Flickr Chris 18 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted December 4, 2016 Share #24558 Posted December 4, 2016 It's been a long time, but I finally got around to doing some portraits that I had promised this couple back in the summer. 645n, 120/f4, FP4+, HC-110, a strobe, two fill lights and the X1 for the scans. Calora and Keith 3 by chrism229, on Flickr Calora and Keith 2 by chrism229, on Flickr Calora and Keith 1 by chrism229, on Flickr Chris great stuff, Chris. So great to hear from you. The last one is my fav by far. Lovely tender moment that they will cherish for a long time. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted December 4, 2016 Share #24559 Posted December 4, 2016 Haha, yes I will get a longer lens too, but probably one of the FE models. Is it really the C Superachromat you have? I would have thought you'd go for the CF. Incidentally when the original Earthrise photograph was taken on Christmas Eve 1968 William Anders almost missed the shot. Here's the audio recording. Philip - Ha, ha, pay back is a b$tch Seriously, it was this photo that was taken with the lens by NASA in 1969 on the moon (wide open @ 1/250 on Ektachrome) that was the closer for me moon.jpg 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted December 4, 2016 Share #24560 Posted December 4, 2016 Haha, yes I will get a longer lens too, but probably one of the FE models. Is it really the C Superachromat you have? I would have thought you'd go for the CF. Incidentally when the original Earthrise photograph was taken on Christmas Eve 1968 William Anders almost missed the shot. Here's the audio recording. yes, you are right, I picked up the CF (black) and not the silver C that was used in 1969. I think my lens was made in the late 80's. But that moon photo still blew me away and I hope NASA negotiated a royalty deal with Zeiss for that one! That audio recording is HILARIOUS! How many astronauts does it take to screw in a light bulb?? :) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now