Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44521  Posted December 27, 2017 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) This is right. There are a variety of options.  1 - DeVere makes an enlarger that has a facility to print from digital files onto silver paper. In place of a film negative they have an electronic device that creates an transparent image. I have never seen one, but DeVere is a good name, so...  2. There are a number of labs that will take a digital file and make a silver print. There is Digital Silver Imaging (Boston I believe) and Ilford Lab Direct. I have tried them both, and I was very pleased and impressed. I think there are others.  The down sides are that the DeVere is expensive, and the labs take some time (usually about 10-14 days from when I send the file) and some money (but nothing outrageous).  The results were excellent. But I can do as well with my focomat 1c and Ilford Multigrade Classic paper. I have used Ilford Lab Direct 2-3 times when I wanted a print larger than I can conveniently make myself. I don't stock big paper, and I only have 2 big trays. And I want big prints only every 2-3 years for something special (e.g. a request for something big from a friend or family member).  Michael , one box of Ilford Mutigrade paper in format 12,7x17,8 cms (100 sheets) costs 34 Euros so one photo is around 3.4 cents. The second advantage is silver paper impressed by the light of enlarger , not deposit ink on paper like in digital printer and in addition you need your computer and inkjetprinter , the great difference... and the pleasure to work in darkroom , not in front of his computer You can also choose one part of your negative and crop a little like for portrait .... Best Henry Edited December 27, 2017 by Doc Henry 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 27, 2017 Posted December 27, 2017 Hi Doc Henry, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44522 Â Posted December 27, 2017 img737-2.JPG Â Minox AX, Pan-X Â img719-2.JPG Â Minox AX, Pan-X Â Wayne Superb grain and b&w picture , no equivalent elsewhere even with photosoftware Best Henry 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44523 Â Posted December 27, 2017 Surely, this must be the SL that Henry meant Looks great in Shirley's hands, methinks. Â Â Flickr 50/1.4A Portra 160 (EI80) Â Lovely picture Philip and wonderful color Best Henry 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44524  Posted December 27, 2017 Gary and I trying to be artistic by shooting a selfie (or is that a wefie?) on a passing bus.  Ghent   Flickr 50/1.4A Portra 160 (EI80)  Superb Philip and in addition nice color Best Henry 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44525  Posted December 27, 2017 -Alster innercity area - color by Paradise film M2  am strand 17.jpg  Very nice picture in color Becker Best Henry 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44526  Posted December 27, 2017 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  Minox AX, Pan-X 14 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  Minox AX, Pan-X ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3426105'>More sharing options...
philipus Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44527  Posted December 27, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) This one is particularly nice, Wayne. br Philip  img719-2.JPG  Minox AX, Pan-X 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44528  Posted December 27, 2017 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  Minox AX, Pan-X 10 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  Minox AX, Pan-X ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3426111'>More sharing options...
philipus Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44529  Posted December 27, 2017 A more from Ghent. Shirley getting back at me and Gary and Henry in the zone. Plus me, again missing focus, which I'm getting increasingly good at  Flickr  Flickr  Flickr 13 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44530 Â Posted December 27, 2017 No Philip it's Digit SL https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/253460-3rd-party-lens-performance-on-sl/?p=3425049 Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44531  Posted December 27, 2017 (edited) Another example difference in color  Case 3 :  M8 160 Isos and M7 Kodak Portra 160 taken same time , same place , same lens in Ghent 2017 Pictures uncorrected DNG and TIFF > JPEG for post as usual  Road sign with the difference in color of the stone wall , the white wall , the yellow line etc... All is different   M8 160 Isos > a little magenta cast  Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  M7 KP 160   I know that it is useless for those who are determined to use digital but I show it with evidence that the monolayer sensor is not good for the moment. Remember this difference when you use digital.  a part of this difference provides of the insufficient light * that touches the pixels with the Bayer filter on the monolayer sensor as mentioned above.  Best Henry  * Red and Blue 25% of light Green 50% and saturation by the camera software Edited December 27, 2017 by Doc Henry 8 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  M7 KP 160   I know that it is useless for those who are determined to use digital but I show it with evidence that the monolayer sensor is not good for the moment. Remember this difference when you use digital.  a part of this difference provides of the insufficient light * that touches the pixels with the Bayer filter on the monolayer sensor as mentioned above.  Best Henry  * Red and Blue 25% of light Green 50% and saturation by the camera software ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3426163'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44532  Posted December 27, 2017 Leica MP, Noctilux 1/50, Neopan 400 @3200, XTol, V750  2017-12-02_05-57-53.jpg  Superb picture XBel Best Henry 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44533  Posted December 27, 2017 Chamonix 10x8, Schneider-Kreuznach Symmar-S 360mm/f6.8 @ f6.8, 1/8 second, one Impact strobe, Galaxy Hyperspeed paper at ISO 50, pre-flashed though plain printer paper (same exposure as for taking), Ilford MG developer, Epson V850 scan:  Thomas 10x8 by chrism229, on Flickr  Chris  Chris wonderful portrait in definition , contrast , b&w tone and softness An example of a soul in film portrait Must be printed Chris Best Henry 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Ricoh Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44534  Posted December 27, 2017 (edited) Another example difference in color  Case 3 :  M8 160 Isos and M7 Kodak Portra 160 taken same time , same place , same lens in Ghent 2017 Pictures uncorrected DNG and TIFF > JPEG for post as usual  Road sign with the difference in color of the stone wall , the white wall , the yellow line etc... All is different   M8 160 Isos > a little magenta cast  M7 KP 160  (Pics above)  I know that it is useless for those who are determined to use digital but I show it with evidence that the monolayer sensor is not good for the moment. Remember this difference when you use digital.  a part of this difference provides of the insufficient light * that touches the pixels with the Bayer filter on the monolayer sensor as mentioned above.  Best Henry  * Red and Blue 25% of light Green 50% and saturation by the camera software  You would make a super salesman for Digital Cam's, Henry If you get tired of medicine you know what to do :) Edited December 27, 2017 by Steve Ricoh 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share #44535  Posted December 27, 2017 (edited) You would make a super salesman for Digital Cam's, Henry If you get tired of medicine you know what to do :)  Thanks Steve As in my profession, I am just honest with myself and think to find the flaw in the sensor ... but as the economy of the production of sensors and softwares is important I know it's a sword stroke in the water , but I hope that people will quickly realize this difference that the color of the sensor is the best because it's not true Best Henry Edited December 27, 2017 by Doc Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44536  Posted December 27, 2017 Chamonix 10x8, Schneider-Kreuznach Symmar-S 360mm/f6.8 @ f6.8, 1/8 second, one Impact strobe, Galaxy Hyperspeed paper at ISO 50, pre-flashed though plain printer paper (same exposure as for taking), Ilford MG developer, Epson V850 scan:  Thomas 10x8 by chrism229, on Flickr  Chris Excellent, Chris. A worthy subject and a worthy photographer. A nice way to see out 2017.  How are you liking the Chamonix? 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44537 Â Posted December 27, 2017 Too kind Eoin, by far. It's nice when it it clicks. ...just like a camera 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44538  Posted December 27, 2017 When it comes to architecture my taste runs to the extremes: if I cannot have Notre Dame, just give me the basics.  img712.jpg  Minox AX Black.....one of only 200 in existence , Kodak Pan-X This is more painting than photo, Wayne - I love it. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Ricoh Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44539  Posted December 27, 2017 When it comes to architecture my taste runs to the extremes: if I cannot have Notre Dame, just give me the basics.   img712.jpg  Minox AX Black.....one of only 200 in existence , Kodak Pan-X Low tech wins and Minox rocks! Love this shot Wayne! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted December 27, 2017 Share #44540  Posted December 27, 2017 A more from Ghent. Shirley getting back at me and Gary and Henry in the zone. Plus me, again missing focus, which I'm getting increasingly good at  Flickr  Flickr  Flickr 3 reprobates - Lucky Shirley was there to keep you all in check. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now