Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

 

...some steps away from the 'tourist-mainstream'...

 

attachicon.gifM4_32 (2 von 4).jpg

 

M4 - CBiogon - CHM100 - D76

 

 

Mathias , very nice framing-composition and black tonality

The shadows in foreground give a relief to the photo

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Have been out of the country since Easter, unfortunately with very little photography activity during that time. Did manage one roll of Tri-X in my Rolleicord Vb (shame on me!)

 

'Squares'.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been out of the country since Easter, unfortunately with very little photography activity during that time. Did manage one roll of Tri-X in my Rolleicord Vb (shame on me!)

 

'Squares'.

 

Keith , fews days ago just have some thoughts about you ... :)

Glad see you back with this beautiful picture in black and white

Superb grain of the wall :)

Thank you

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On a flight (including some reflections and/or sort of stars for Philip and Henry  :) )

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

M4-P, 28, RolleiIR400, svn

 

Rgds

 

C.

  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Morning light.  Rolleicord Vb, Tri-X, Rodinal.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

On a flight (including some reflections and/or sort of stars for Philip and Henry  :) )

 

attachicon.gif170408_1_M4-P_0007.jpg

M4-P, 28, RolleiIR400, svn

 

Rgds

 

C.

 

Impressive picture and nice contre-jour Christoph :)

Thank you

 

 

 

...  I have also one picture to show you :)

 

During the trip of my last humanitarian mission in september 2016 and above India,

our plane avoid a stormy area  (you see on the right under the wing, the cumulo-nimbus

like a big mushroom).

Sky suddenly turns black , we are at 9000 m :)

 

 

Kodak Portra 160-Leica M7-Summicron 28 Asph

Picture uncorrected > natural color

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Rg

Henry

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Love this one, Philip.  That lens handles direct sunlight very well.  Renders very similar to my 28mm summaron.

Speaking of stars, here's my favourite G-type main sequence star illuminating some pedestrians.

 

35243545932_985bb4dc41_b.jpg

Flickr

M4 50/2 (11817) 5222 in Diafine

 

Gorgeous, like a painting.

M3 50mm summarit, Agfa vista 200, home developed in Rollei digibase.

Somewhere in the Peak District

Pete

attachicon.gifM3 Portra 160197.jpg

 

Great photo, Henry.

Last humanit mission Sept 2016

Day of departure at sunset :)

in Airbus A 350

 

Kodak TMAX400-Leica MP-Summilux 50 Asph

 

 

attachicon.gifImage2danairpkodtmaxlfht++++-2-3fois-1000.jpg

 

Best

Henry

 

Sincere thanks, Philip.  I really appreciate your close look.  I have gone back and re-worked some of these, particularly #3, which has the most saturation which Ektar found a little overwhelming.  I will post the latest version of that in a minute.

Well you certainly haven't made it easy for us this time, Adam :)

 

It's amazing how much the light changes a scene. This is pretty obvious of course but I hadn't fully appreciated the extent of this change in the context of a sunset. It's difficult to pick one as the 'best' photo but nos 1 and 4 appeal to me the most. The first one because the light is very pleasant and because the image seems to retain a great deal of detail in the buildings. It is a great sunset photo, better than nos 3 and 4 which Ektar seems to have depicted slightly too saturated for my liking. The fourth I like, and perhaps more than no. 1, because it is so unexpected. I would never have thought that the scene would look like that just minutes after no. 3, in particular that the sky would turn so grey. There's a very cool contrast between the greys and reds, like something taken from Sin City, the movie.

 

All this said, though, I think they work best as a series. That strengthens the contrast between them and makes each stand out the most clearly. It also shows what a spectacle a sunset really is. I've always liked the German word for sunset, Sonnenuntergang, the latter part of which (like in Swedish) can mean 'sinking' but also 'going under', 'downfall', 'destruction', 'demise' and 'doom'. All rather powerful words but then again seeing a star disappear, even if only for a night, is pretty massive.

 

br

Philip

 

 

Last sunlight of the day.

 

attachicon.gifimage133037.jpg

 

Canon Tlb, Canon 50mm 3.5 Macro FL, Agfa vista 200

 

Gary - you are a great flower photographer.  Love the colors.

Sticking with the flowers.

Contax N1

Vario Sonnar 24-85

Fuji RDP3

Plustek 8100

Gary

 

Love this one.

Sanctuary Point, NSW, Australia.

Hasselblad, 80MM, Acros

 

Welcome back, Keith.  Hope all is well and love your photo :)

Have been out of the country since Easter, unfortunately with very little photography activity during that time. Did manage one roll of Tri-X in my Rolleicord Vb (shame on me!)

 

'Squares'.

 

Striking shot, Christoph.  The B&W really accentuates the composition and light.

On a flight (including some reflections and/or sort of stars for Philip and Henry  :) )

 

attachicon.gif170408_1_M4-P_0007.jpg

M4-P, 28, RolleiIR400, svn

 

Rgds

 

C.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is where I am currently holding with my June 8 sunset series (all taken within a span of about 45 minutes)...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 
 
 
 
Edited by A miller
  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

#3 (still a work in progress as I try to tame the Ektar beast...)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by A miller
  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

#4

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

#5

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the most believable and illustrative for me, Adam.  Very nice with the combination of ambient and artificial light. 

 

Thanks, Steve.  It was perhaps in the top two or three sunsets I have ever experienced in NYC.  Totally surreal and the Ektar did a superb job of capturing the details in the buildings and bridge despite the very strong backlight.  And of course the Biogon was a champ with the minimal vignetting despite some extremely long exposures (2-6 minutes, either b/c of the lack of light or the desire on my part to use a 6 stop ND grad in order to remove the passing ships, which were many but I made them disappear :) )

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Henry - I don't have a scanner for negatives. I do devellop the photos on Ilford genuine gelatine FB mat paper and am able to scan the photos once they're dry. I'm just up from the darkroom and scanned the same photo my wife scanned on her Epson film scanner and that I posted . I think the way I do is  much less perfect. But it does have more athmosphere in my opinion - also, the old enlarger I use crops less of the photo than the scanner does, although the scanner is run on 6x9 program. Here the same picture as yesterday, - but here the whole dark room process is done, I the simply scanned the photo and simply enhanced the contrast in photoshop. Compare by yourself.

"Truth" or "perfection" in photography is really a very subjective thing. I often think of Stieglitz when he shot the photo with the horse van in the snow, in New York. His photographer friends all said : Your picture is not sharp, worth nothing. Stieglitz answer was: It looks perfect to me. One of the problems we all do have with digital photography is its perfection. Too much perfection is sometimes closer to Madame Tussaud's wax sculptures ( ...dead images)  than to real life. But these are simply my thoughts - You know. I do have no scanner, I do have no Handy ( I-phone, smartphone a.s.o.). My wife does. I still write letters. With a quill or a fountain pen. And shoot vintage cameras... my kids told me I would have been the perfect hipster. When I asked them what they call a hipster they explained that to me. And told me that in my case, I could not be a hipster, as I was a true "vintage" , "made" in the 1950s ;-)

That much for today :-)

attachicon.gifWeb.Tour en vélo A.S. Mecher 19.6.17. Voigtländer .jpg

 

If I remember well, this was Tri-X, but stand develloped in Tetenal Paranol S in a 1:100 dilution for one hour and 15 minutes, Henry. I'm a bit upside down with work and in the evening and on rare moments of "freedom" testing this and that so I do not always remember what film I used . For a couple of days now I write down everything - so that I can learn from good moments aswell as from mistakes. I did use some old ( 20 years old...out of the fridge)  Ilford and Kodak films recently, so You might be right. I am concentrated on the cams I use  - Rolleiflex, Yashicaflex ( also a terrific lens in my eyes, though I had to clean it a bit ) , my dad's Voigtländer and the Leica of course. I am trying to find out what camera / lens / format fits best to my ideas. So most of the time I stick to the Kodak Tri-X, not to get too confused. But I happen to use the older films when test-shooting a "new" cam friends give to me. In case they would not work fine. Mostly they do - even after decades. I'll try to be more rational. It won't be easy, as I still do not know whether I prefer stand devellopment or short time devellopment , Paranol ( softer) or Kodak jelly 1:63 ( more "hardcore") . I'll do my best to take notes in the future. 

Jean-Marie

 

Here's a Tri-X 400 pic in HC110 in a 1:63 dillution, Voigtländer Bessa from 1948. It is a scan of the film, I shot it 2 days ago and my wife scanned the negatives.

 

attachicon.gifWeb.Alex Singer on tour 19.6.2017 .jpg

 

Jean-Marie , thanks for your explanation.I understand
I think the first picture posted above is a bit nicer but photo of the print is also fine
Yes sometimes too much sharp is less nice and I agree with you
Henry
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...