Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

About "wedding"  I have taken 2 years ago , with digital (M9-M8) and film (M7-MP)

but the married prefer pictures in film :) . I offer them an album with print in Kodak Royal

paper , not jet print !

 

 

Here some pictures taken with my M7-35 Summilux Asph-Kodak Portra 400 :)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

...  the photographer behind has 2 Canon 5DII

 

 

 

Best

Henry

 

Kodak Portra developed by myself in Tetenal 38°C :)

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

I shoot weddings with natural light in a natural way but on digital cameras. I shot film for years as a press photographer then moved to digital before starting weddings, nothing would scate me more than shooting a whole wedding on film, especially the way i shoot. I'm begining to shoot a few frames here amd there on my leica but i couldn't shoot the whole day.

M9/M10 with your M2 :rolleyes: for next years weddings

Edited by gsgary
Link to post
Share on other sites

About "wedding"  I have taken 2 years ago , with digital (M9-M8) and film (M7-MP)

but the married prefer pictures in film :) . I offer them an album with print in Kodak Royal

paper , not jet print !

 

 

Here some pictures taken with my M7-35 Summilux Asph-Kodak Portra 400 :)

 

attachicon.gifImage2wedaudetk400m7ht+++600-50ct (2).jpg

 

...  the photographer behind has 2 Canon 5DII

 

attachicon.gifImage3wedetaudk400m7ht+++1100-50.jpg

 

attachicon.gifImage7weddetiaudk400m7ht+++1100-50.jpg

 

Best

Henry

 

Kodak Portra developed by myself in Tetenal 38°C :)

 

and with Kodak TX400 and Leica MP - 50 Summilux Asph :)

TX dev myself in Kodak Pro D76 at 22°C

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Rg

Henry

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Edward it's very easy to develop yourself specially b&w if you like b&w film

Just need a tank and a little time. Work well done with no scratches

Henry

And just developed my first E6 (Velvia and Provia... What do 6x9 positives look impressive.. just can't wait to scan them, and then I'll show some here!

 

Cheers, Chris

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

M9/M10 with your M2 :rolleyes: for next years weddings

I don't think my wife would let me remortgage the house ☹ Besides, i love shooting wedding on my Sony A7Rii it feels closer to film than the canon's i've used for years. I would love to use an M10 at a wedding though, so if there are any sponsors out there

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

A touch of colour again.

Leicaflex SL

35 Summicron R

Kodak 200

Epson 4870

Gary

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think my wife would let me remortgage the house ☹ Besides, i love shooting wedding on my Sony A7Rii it feels closer to film than the canon's i've used for years. I would love to use an M10 at a wedding though, so if there are any sponsors out there

I might actually use my A7 with my new VC 21f4

 

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think my wife would let me remortgage the house ☹ Besides, i love shooting wedding on my Sony A7Rii it feels closer to film than the canon's i've used for years. I would love to use an M10 at a wedding though, so if there are any sponsors out there

 

Welsh , I prefer clearly film ,  already 4 weddings during 3 last years

and the married prefer film 

https://photographylife.com/why-i-shoot-film-as-a-wedding-photographer/

The soft side when watching pictures , I mean not agressive and sharp as a rasor ,

the "flat" side of the picture in digital, the "synthetic" side of image coming from

a "robot" camera (by photo software inside) and finally the result of color not faithful *...

that's why film is appreciated by the couple instead of digital image . 

Regards

Henry

 

* sensor color optical spectre is not suited with physiological color spectre of eye for the moment

at the state of sensor manufacture in 2017, even for the M10 . Do you know that ?

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

A touch of colour again.

Leicaflex SL

35 Summicron R

Kodak 200

Epson 4870

Gary

 

Gary I regret not to have the Summicron 35 R because the rendering looks very nice

in your photo. Color is really refreshing and beautiful I mean blue

Thanks

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And a colourful "failure".

Camera and film unknown.

Gary

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

For Chris who loves orchid :)  and taken at  12.000 Kms from Europa

 

 

Fuji Superia 100-R4S-Summicron 50

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris , have you already seen white orchid :) ?

 

M-Summilux 50 Asph

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris ....  and in purple :)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Same camera , lens and film as above  

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welsh , I prefer clearly film ,  already 4 weddings during 3 last years

and the married prefer film 

https://photographylife.com/why-i-shoot-film-as-a-wedding-photographer/

The soft side when watching pictures , I mean not agressive and sharp as a rasor ,

the "flat" side of the picture in digital, the "synthetic" side of image coming from

a "robot" camera (by photo software inside) and finally the result of color not faithful *...

that's why film is appreciated by the couple instead of digital image . 

Regards

Henry

 

* sensor color optical spectre is not suited with physiological color spectre of eye for the moment

at the state of sensor manufacture in 2017, even for the M10 . Do you know that ?

For me it's the practicality of digital over film at a wedding, the way weddings are shot has changed dramatically in the last 20 year, to shoot how i shoot film would look good but I would be shooting 3200 or 1600 or push processing all the time and that look is only appealing to a minority of couples, it's a target audience that in my part of the world would not sustain me.

kelly_greg_0048.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it's the practicality of digital over film at a wedding, the way weddings are shot has changed dramatically in the last 20 year, to shoot how i shoot film would look good but I would be shooting 3200 or 1600 or push processing all the time and that look is only appealing to a minority of couples, it's a target audience that in my part of the world would not sustain me.

kelly_greg_0048.jpg

 

Yes Welsh, for the practicability I agree the only reason for me and I understand your argument

.... but you can also do the same thing with film for the beauty of the image , the soul of what you watch :)

Best regards

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Henry,

I have a bowl of small white, red and purple orchids. Here are two of those colours:

 

33364201193_5db752337a_c.jpg

Orchids by chrism229, on Flickr

Pentax SF1n, 50/1.7 with extension tube, Fuji Superia 400, Unicolor, X1 scan.

 

and some more 6x45:

33346618273_98e033707f_c.jpg

Cedar Waxwing by chrism229, on Flickr

 

34027011631_5bee189151_c.jpg

Squirrel feeder by chrism229, on Flickr

 

34000401972_e2001dd8c6_c.jpg

Thieving squirrel by chrism229, on Flickr

 

C.

Edited by chrism
  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like flash during a wedding because it disturbs the ceremony and some priests

don't like, I prefer monopod more practical but in pictures below only my MP is sufficient

I don't need also to push film , here Kodak TX400 to 800 , but I can if I want

 

 

Another wedding of "Marie" and "Ludovic" son of one friend practician in Montelimar in 2016 .

All the wedding is in film , some in digital (M9-M8) but I don't put them in the album.

too much "digital" in comparison with film !

Black of film is a real black with grain , natural grain not artificial grain from photo software

 

The signature :)

The prof. photographer with a digital camera hasn't take this scene , so the couple is

happy to know I took them.

Paul is at right and Marie is at left

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Leica MP-50 Summilux Asph very luminous lens for wedding so no flash needed

Kodak TX400 (dev myself in Kodak Pro D76)

Not need monopod :)

 

Best

Henry

 

and I add this notice of the professional photographer

The photographer told me that he is afraid that these pictures with his Canon and Nikon

are not beautiful because too much bright and strong spots light , like you can see in the

picture . I do not have this problem with film !

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Henry,

I have a bowl of small white, red and purple orchids. Here are two of those colours:

 

33364201193_5db752337a_c.jpg

Orchids by chrism229, on Flickr

Pentax SF1n, 50/1.7 with extension tube, Fuji Superia 400, Unicolor, X1 scan.

 

and some more 6x45:

33346618273_98e033707f_c.jpg

Cedar Waxwing by chrism229, on Flickr

 

34027011631_5bee189151_c.jpg

Squirrel feeder by chrism229, on Flickr

 

34000401972_e2001dd8c6_c.jpg

Thieving squirrel by chrism229, on Flickr

 

C.

 

SUPERB Chris Thank you very much  :)

What pleasure to see nature in film , a beauty and honnor to the nature

Best

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...