Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

IIIA, 28mm Color Skopar, Lomo 100

 

attachicon.gifimg198-2.JPG

 

 

Welta Weltur 4.5x6, Fuji Acros 100, Xenar 7.5cm 2.8

 

attachicon.gifimg229-2.JPG

 

The "Wash Haus" in the Main Straße ... in Kentucky. .... hahahah

 

I can see from my office in Frankfurt the river "Main". May be there are any connections/mysteries .... :o

 

:)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome back Henry, we've missed you. I am very sorry for your loss and wish you strength. I know you like flowers so here is one of my crocus shots, this time on Provia 400X.

 

33431151201_62a3cdbfbe_b.jpg

Flickr

80 Planar+32E

 

Philip thank you for posting this nice lys.

Color is wonderful

Best

Henry

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is excellent, Richard, like a symphony of lines or something. Really cool and great tonality too.

 

Some folded space with the SWC/M, Tri-X

 

33542940866_59a0b87ae4_c.jpg

 

It must be great to find an area like this and have a camera with you, like striking gold. These are truly terrific, Xenia. The panoramic format works perfectly for them. My favourite is the last one. Where was it shot, in Sweden?

 

Fogg for Henry!

Very sorry for your loss, but good to have you back!
You are the soul of this thread.....

Xenia


attachicon.gifIMG_7199.JPG

attachicon.gifIMG_7200.JPG

attachicon.gifIMG_7237.JPG

attachicon.gifIMG_7202.JPG

XPan and Velvia 50

 

I prefer the colour one, Henry.

 

Now in color for Xenia I know she prefers color

 

 

Kodak Portra 160 (Tetenal 38°C)-SL-Summicron 50

 

attachicon.gifImage24eolkp16sl-2rllfht++++950.jpg

 

Kodak TX400 (D76 22°C) -R4S-Summicron 50

Picture taken almost in the same place

 

attachicon.gifImage8eolrethelkodtxr4slfhtcipred+++950.jpg

 

Which you prefer ? color or b&w ?

 

Best

Henry

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

For Philip with great thanks

 

at sunset

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Kodak TX400 (D76-22°C)-R4S-Summicron 50

 

Best

Henry

 

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Before continuing on to other lion constellations and other wildlife, two single lion shots.

 

1N 200/2.8L+2x Ektachrome 200

 

33455335426_2c499feae3_b.jpg

Flickr

 

32682394193_c564fa214e_b.jpg

Flickr

 

All your pictures series of Africa are superb : color , rendering and atmosphere

Nice composition and framing . Thank for posting Philip.

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wayne, the subjects/motives are very nice, I like them ... Only one question ... The grainy structure is typical for this kind of the Lomo filme?

 

Best

Gregor

I cannot say. At first I thought there might be a problem with my chemistry, but developed a roll of Ektar with same chemistry and had no similar problems/results. I purchased three rolls of 35mm, Lomo 100 film. This was the fist to be shot and developed. The second was shot in my M7 and will be developed in the next day or two. I have shot and processed the Lomo 100 film in 120 and did not see any peculiarities in resulting negatives.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

For Gary, a second picture of Jeanne d'Arc in front of our cathedral

 

in color and b&w, taken at the same time and same place

 

 

Kodak Portra 160 (Tetenal 38°C) -SL-50 Summicron

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Kodak TX400 (D76 Kodak-22°C) -R4s-Summicron 50

 

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

For Gary, a second picture of Jeanne d'Arc in front of our cathedral

 

in color and b&w, taken at the same time and same place

 

 

Kodak Portra 160 (Tetenal 38°C) -SL-50 Summicron

 

attachicon.gifImage3racathkp16lxslcipredrlfht+++550.jpg

 

Kodak TX400 (D76 Kodak-22°C) -R4s-Summicron 50

 

attachicon.gifImage2catrskodtx4r4scipredrlfht+++550.jpg

 

Best

Henry

 

and as I said to Gary , in my conclusion above

 

 

more definition in the shadows in original Kodak TX400 in comparison

Portra color converted > b&w (Color Efex conversion)

 

Crop 60%

 

Color converted in b&w

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Original TX400

 

 

Conclusion : better not converted color picture in b&w > loss of definition

in the shadows

 

Henry

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

For Gary as promised

Two pictures just scan.

 

Kodak Portra 400-R8 and M7-90 ME and VarioElmar 35-70

 

Mondial Air Ballon

at sunset

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

Before continuing on to other lion constellations and other wildlife, two single lion shots.

 

1N 200/2.8L+2x Ektachrome 200

 

33455335426_2c499feae3_b.jpg

Flickr

 

32682394193_c564fa214e_b.jpg

Flickr

 

Pippa has been fascinated by your lions (as you know, she knows the masai mara well). Apparently there aren't so many left and there is difficulty in convincing the young masai boys that they need not, and ought not to kill a lion to symbolise their transition to warriorhood.

 

Chris

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome back Henry! My sincere commiserations at your loss, though no flowers from me I'm afraid may I brighten this moment with a recent photo from a place I am fond of ...


Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Leica R6 - 50mm Summicron - Ilford HP5

 

Charles

 

 

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just hung up the 35mm XP2 to dry, and I see a problem. The same thing happened with the 120 film - some of the frames are very thin and are probably unusable. When it happened with the 120 film, I assumed that since some were fine, and some were thin, that perhaps the shutter in my ancient Sonnar 150/4 wasn't working at some speeds (they were taken on a tripod at speeds like 1/8 and 1/4 which I probably hadn't used before). But this 35mm film has just come out of an F6 which hasn't had any problems at all and it's showing the same thing. Is it possible that the film has a threshold below which it won't register much of anything? There were no problems with the films going on the Hewes reels and no indication that the film had been in contact with itself or anything of that sort.
So if it's going to be hit or miss I can't recommend 3200. When it's dry, I'll scan and show any decent ones simply to assess any graininess in the smaller format, but in future I'll limit myself to 1600 which didn't have that problem at all.

Chris

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the 35mm XP2 at 3200. I don't care for the texture very much - it looks like 3200!

 

33480620421_d53021428a_c.jpg

Experiment in Push Processing 9 by chrism229, on Flickr

 

32767093954_97455f356a_c.jpg

Experiment in Push Processing 7 by chrism229, on Flickr

 

I'll stick with 1600 for pushing 120 film, and I'll have to find out if the 35mm will tolerate 1600 or whether that ought to be limited to 800.

 

Chris

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...