Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

M3, Zeiss 50/2 Planar, Ilford HP5 @ 1600, D76

 

32976683140_ce10aed303_c.jpg

Untitled by Brendan | Toews, on Flickr

Brendan

 

Absolutely stunning shot. Where and when and how was it taken?

 

Don't think it was Wales this year, that would be a wellies and mud bath job; worst luck.

 

Great range of tones and one can almost feel the cold and noise of the water. Thanks for sharing.

 

Regards

 

Christopher

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happened there? Misalignment of the film on the spool?

 

There was a last year a backing paper problem with emulsions effects with the Kodak 120 films. I thought this is only a b/w -emulsion issue ... until my scans of the sunset.

 

Ian (aka wattsy) informed us about a discussion on the APUG.

 

Best

Gregor

Edited by Ratzfatz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

A few taken with my 503 using Etkar 100.......one has some vinaigrette that I have no idea why but I like the colors that that film produces

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Last

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The colours look nice and surreal here.

 

Rgds

 

C.

We might be looking at an over-exposed image that has been rescued, given the reddish colour of the underside of the rock formation on the left. Nothing wrong with doing that, as I'm sure we all have done the same. ;)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

A few taken with my 503 using Etkar 100.......one has some vinaigrette that I have no idea why but I like the colors that that film produces

 

I need your spellchecker; it makes for a more interesting world than reality provides.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a well documented problem with recent batches of some Kodak 120 film. It is believed to be why 120 T-Max 100 has not been available for months and your's isn't the first time I've heard of it happening with 120 Portra 400 too. Andy Piper has written quite a bit about this in the film forum here. There is more discussion here on APUG.

 

I don't have any fresh Kodak 120 film (all old and frozen) but I have seen a different problem with the XP2 I have been using the last couple of weeks. The wording down the side of the film (says 'Ilford XP2 Super') has been wandering into the image area. Easily cropped out, but if I were better at composition I might have been annoyed.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a very cool idea. Any Bard plays being put up?

 

Not sure Philip, and to be completely honest it's not really my cup of tea.

 

But I'd flown over it numerous times as it was being constructed, and happened to be there this day with time to wander about.

 

It was an interesting concept.

Gary

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jaap - I don't really believe you.  You will just have to show us here...

Since when am I a digital guy? I like -and use- film too... I play no favorites.

 

Very lovely.  Would love to see a wet print.

 

M3, Zeiss 50/2 Planar, Ilford HP5 @ 1600, D76

 
32976683140_ce10aed303_c.jpg
Untitled by Brendan | Toews, on Flickr

 

 

Neil - Yes, nice vignaigrette; but the second one has some whipped cream that I'd like to lick off...

A few taken with my 503 using Etkar 100.......one has some vinaigrette that I have no idea why but I like the colors that that film produces

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Washington Square Park, Greenwich Village, NYC

M3, 50mm DR summicron, Portra 160

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has seen some truly terrific flower photography so I thought I should try some myself. When I was on Gotland two weeks ago I pointed my camera at various snowdrops in my mother's garden. Like many plants they're quite easy to shoot, being stationary for one, but the main problem for me was the wind. These little flowers catch a surprising amount of wind and always seem to move. The other challenge was the almost non-existent depth of field using one or both of my extension rings (16 and 32).

 

Galanthus nivalis

 

32982605110_19a251d78b_b.jpg

Flickr

80 Planar+32E Ektar 100

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...