Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

For Adam again another Ektar one of his favorite film :D

 

 

Quartier Latin or student area.... memory memory for me

Paris

near Sainte Genevieve church posted above

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

M7-28 Cron A.-Kodak Ektar 100

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

And also to contribute an image, from your country Henry!

Shot with an Olympus XA (not the best, but really small, so as HCB said: the best camera is the one with you) on Kodak Ektar 100.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ian, I think Adam speaks about the difference in  the order of 1/1000 of millimeters or in microns.

 

 

I know, Henry. Just a bit of banter with Adam. :)

 

A small section of the large henge at Avebury. Incredible to think that this was dug out of the chalk using just hand tools made from deer antlers and cattle bones.

Converted Poundland film and 28/F2.

 

MA002202-w.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, Henry. Just a bit of banter with Adam. :)

 

A small section of the large henge at Avebury. Incredible to think that this was dug out of the chalk using just hand tools made from deer antlers and cattle bones.

Converted Poundland film and 28/F2.

 

MA002202-w.jpg

Ian :D

 

Very nice and in 3D the relief is superb by the shadow and the contre_jour

Well done Ian

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And also to contribute an image, from your country Henry!

Shot with an Olympus XA (not the best, but really small, so as HCB said: the best camera is the one with you) on Kodak Ektar 100.

It's very difficult to have entirely this tower

Well framing CW

Thanks for sharing

Regards

Henry

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Elmarit-M 2.8/28III, HP5/400

 

Rgds

 

C.

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the consequences of global warming , catastrophic floods in Vietnam
Normally there is a street on the left and is flooded ! :(

(taken during one of my last humanitarian mission)

 

Fuji Superia

MP-35 Lux

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Keeping out the Spanish sunshine.  IIIg + 5cm Collapsible Summicron (a sixty-five year old lens which rarely fails to delight!), Acros 100.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your statement is based on fact and not on opinion, then? Does it take into account that the RF mechanism has been somewhat redesigned for the digital bodies, those having a greater girth? Can you disclose the source of your information, please?

 

My local camera tech had a few of them taken apart on the bench. There's as much difference between the various genera of the different film models (M3, M4, M4-2, M6) as there is between all of them collectively and the M8, M9-all of these open on the bench that we were looking at. 

 

The greater depth of the digital M bodies has little to do with the RF mechanism, it is by-and-large nearly identical. The mount register is identical, the cam and follower setups, all the mechanical bits, have necessarily the same geometry (or the lenses would be incompatible). The larger differences are minor changes in the optics to accommodate the digital body's additional readouts and such. The likelihood of maladjustment from a knock or bump is all based on the stability of the mechanism. The optics don't move around on minor bumps ... it's the stability of the mechanicals that causes maladjustment. 

 

I have great faith that the viewfinder mechanisms are equally robust, proven by what I can see by looking at them on the bench in front of me and by my own cameras robustness. That the one has a sensor which can discriminate much more clearly any maladjustment, and that the person using it is sensitive to that critical potential, is a matter of the person's shooting habits along with their tolerance for such errors. 

 

That's enough on this digression for me. I'll move forward by processing another picture or two to post.  B)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Times Square

M7, 35mm summilux asph fle, Cinestill 800T

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...