Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Must admit I now find film indispensable for 'personal' family type photography – it just looks and feels right for this kind of subject matter. 

As a sidenote I must also point out how much I like 'Poundland' film (AgfaVista 200) – in fact, I prefer it, in the main, to the saintly Portra. :o

 

 

18144371284_b103ca4ba9_b.jpg

 
18521628402_549a18265d_b.jpg
 
17905559943_0bf62e919a_b.jpg
 
17903496464_678681e6e7_b.jpg
  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

That said, I'm also finding myself increasingly dissatisfied with my venerable Monochrom for my more 'serious' :rolleyes:  stuff (for reasons I can't fully fathom but I think it's the clarity and resolution – just too much of it – and, for all the so-called "malleability" of the files, the tonality just often isn't right) and find even 35mm ISO 400 film is doing the trick.

 

18499634556_675fc4617c_b.jpg

 
 
 
18339903249_73ec0da440_b.jpg
 
 
 
18339811969_387ca92e08_b.jpg
  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Must admit I now find film indispensable for 'personal' family type photography – it just looks and feels right for this kind of subject matter. 

As a sidenote I must also point out how much I like 'Poundland' film (AgfaVista 200) – in fact, I prefer it, in the main, to the saintly Portra. :o

 

 

18144371284_b103ca4ba9_b.jpg

 
18521628402_549a18265d_b.jpg
 
17905559943_0bf62e919a_b.jpg
 
17903496464_678681e6e7_b.jpg

 

Ian, I agree , really nice pictures and a great film !

Cheers

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Taken last year , in spring

 

Massif du Brévent 2500m (shown above) , this time with no clouds and a bonus for Gary :D

 

Kod TX 400

MP Apo Telyt 135

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

and this picture is for Adam

 

Selfie at 3000 m, -5°C and in the fog  :)

 

KodTX400

MP 50 LA

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

 

That said, I'm also finding myself increasingly dissatisfied with my venerable Monochrom for my more 'serious' :rolleyes:  stuff (for reasons I can't fully fathom but I think it's the clarity and resolution – just too much of it – and, for all the so-called "malleability" of the files, the tonality just often isn't right) and find even 35mm ISO 400 film is doing the trick.

 

18499634556_675fc4617c_b.jpg

 
 
 
18339903249_73ec0da440_b.jpg
 
 
 
18339811969_387ca92e08_b.jpg

 

Ian ... but I think pictures are prettier in general rendering on (silver) paper (vs MM) through an enlarger (not a inkjet printer and PC) :)

Really nice the last one !

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ian ... but I think pictures are prettier in general rendering on (silver) paper (vs MM) through an enlarger (not a inkjet printer and PC) :)

 

I'm not sure it comes down to the paper or the method of putting the photograph on the paper – after all, it is easy to get C-type fibre prints made from digital files (including the Monochrom) and, conversely, film can be scanned and printed on an inkjet – it seems more fundamental to me than that. It is a difference in basic tonality and the balance of clarity and detail, no matter what the viewing medium might be.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ian, 

I will show you (but difficult for me , I sold my Epson flat bed scan V700) that the same picture enlarged with my Focomat on silver paper (Ilford paper) is better in rendering and may be sharper than the same printed in inkjet by my Leica Lab Center ... and with a bonus : no smooth edges and lines of digital  :)

 

It reminds me of the thread on the scanners that we did together several years ago !

Best

Henry

 

...... the printing process is not at all the same as how to make the photographic paper
With the silver layers of photographic paper  (as in the negative) the "printing" or the "sensitization" result  is between the silver layercoming from the (light) of the enlarger. For the inkjet it's only a deposit of the ink on a single plane of the paper

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_paper

and this link translate by Google

https://translate.google.fr/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.studio-plus.fr%2Fphoto-argentique%2Fle-papier-photographique-argentique.html&edit-text=

I hope it works , otherwise copy the original link below and go to "Google translation french-english"  :

http://www.studio-plus.fr/photo-argentique/le-papier-photographique-argentique.html

Edited by Doc Henry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Our vineyard of Champagne in spring

 

KP400

MP 35 LA

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Color reminds me a lot CCD M9

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Henry, I really like all your mountain shots. I guess not many capture shots like this on film nowadays.

 

 

 

An old airplane again,

 

attachicon.gif20150531-33.jpg

M7 Summicron-M 50/2 Ilford XP2

Ellie really nice b&w

Thanks for sharing

Best

Henry

... and thanks for your comment and thumbs up  :) 

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ellie really nice b&w

Thanks for sharing

Best

Henry

... and thanks for your comment and thumbs up  :)

 

Thanks, it was really dark at the museum and I had use 1/10s for many shots (handheld). I thought the slow speed would show more but some shots are better viewed at the small size I posted above ;)

 

I will trade in my Summarit-M 50/2.5 tomorrow... for a Leica tripod with head B)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a rainy day.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

M7 Summicron-M 50/2 Ilford XP2

Edited by Ellie
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Color reminds me a lot CCD M9

 

Best

Henry

very, very nice composition and colors, Henry.  But it looks a good 1-2 stops underexposed on my monitor.

your statement above is ironic and circular.... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our vineyard of Champagne in spring

 

KP400

MP 35 LA

 

attachicon.gifImage13vigflowkp400mp35lalfht+++550.jpg

 

Color reminds me a lot CCD M9

 

Best

Henry

 

very, very nice composition and colors, Henry.  But it looks a good 1-2 stops underexposed on my monitor.

your statement above is ironic and circular.... :)

Adam, your remark is right but it is a simple inversion :D

I should have said :

" M9 is very close to the color of the film" (you can tell me that this is normal) ... because the sensor is manufactured by Kodak :rolleyes:

 

For the picture ,"the eye of the master" :)

...  I added a little exposure and a little contrast ,  it's going now ?

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Thanks for your comment Adam

 

Cheers

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kod Ekt 100

MP 50 LA

 

The reader

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam, your remark is right but it is a simple inversion :D

I should have said :

" M9 is very close to the color of the film" (you can tell me that this is normal) ... because the sensor is manufactured by Kodak :rolleyes:

 

For the picture ,"the eye of the master" :)

...  I added a little exposure and a little contrast ,  it's going now ?

 

attachicon.gifImage13vigflowkp400mp35lalfht+++-3-550.jpg

 

Thanks for your comment Adam

 

Cheers

Henry

yes, this is MUCH better.  I really like the photo.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...