Jeff S Posted July 12, 2013 Share #61 Â Posted July 12, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Ah, but ergonomics and cosmetics are two different issues; the first is a practical one, the side that Jaap notes. Your concern seems all about looks, i.e., cosmetics. Â Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 12, 2013 Posted July 12, 2013 Hi Jeff S, Take a look here Sticking with future Leica's...what is a deal breaker for you?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Leicafanatics Posted August 31, 2013 Share #62 Â Posted August 31, 2013 I'd go nuts if they raises more... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcoles Posted September 1, 2013 Share #63 Â Posted September 1, 2013 I left Nikon for simplicity, size, image and build quality, lack of unneeded or unwanted gadgets and Leica lens selection. I made the change knowing it resulted in having limited macro and telephoto capability. Â With film the camera and lenses were long-term purchases. You upgraded as better or different film were developed. Today the camera and film are one and a major upgrade requires you to buy another camera. Thanks goodness the lenses remain long-term investments. So, another reason to change systems is poor design leading to short-term obsolescence. Given the cost of any Leica M camera care must be taken to guard against technology changes that limit the short or mid-term value. This is a major problem with most if not all of the want-to-be competition and another reason I purchased my M9 and ordered the M. It is a tricky juggling act to produce timely and sound products with a steep technology curve staring you in the face. Hopefully Leica is up to the task, at their price point there is little room for error. Bob Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.