Jump to content

Travel Back-up camera for M8?


chap

Recommended Posts

My choice as of now is a D-Lux 3. I had the Pansonic brand D-Lux 2 and the 3 is better -- not merely because of more pixels, but the processing engine is better, with better high ISO performance. If you shoot RAW, the results can be excellent. And Noise Ninja solves the noise "problem". My second choice would be an RD-1, but that is a more expensive and also heavier solution. Now, to be sure my answer is the answer of someone who does not earn a living making images. If I were in that situation, I would want a backup that enabled the same working process -- another M8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a second M8 for backup however that said, I carry a film based M with Kodachrome that serves well. My fear is theft more than breakdown, so I keep the backups in separate bags. The D-Lux 2 is in my bag as well. It takes superb pictures for a pocket camera (in Raw).

 

To me the problem in travel is not so much the body backup (light) but the darn film or Epson or Gigaview backup required for digital. And the overseas airports that argue with me when I ask that film be hand searched.

Link to post
Share on other sites

M8 + M6 with a brick of film. If you're carrying the lenses, you need a body that lets you keep on using them and get the job done. Also it's so much easier to have two bodies if you need to shift from wide to long. And it's STILL hardly any more money than a 1Ds2 - and the 1Ds3 ain't there yet...

 

I ordered M8 #2 today. I've arrived at the point of believing all will be well.

 

Best

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest tummydoc

Having gone through two DOA's before getting an M8 that's still working (coming up on one month, all fingers still crossed) I'm not in a hurry to buy a second one as a backup because Leica still hasn't identified the cause(s) of the deaths. My backup is one of my other M bodies plus 10 rolls of film. Film and development services are still widely available as of now, and I have a generous assortment of M bodies already paid for. An added bonus is my 21mm is a 21mm on the film body whereas with a second M8 I'd need to purchase a 15mm lens as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

If you want a little backup camera that packs a nice punch the Ricoh GR-D is terrific. I also have a Leica D-lux 3 which I just took to France and it was very nice.

 

The GR is a little more "M like" in it's usage and that's why I rank it ahead as a backup :)

 

Kent

I had been wrestling with this question for some time. What I really wanted was a digital Leica CM. But as this hope seems doomed, I recently bought the Ricoh GR-D and am most impressed with its quality and ergonomics. No major delving into menus with two context sensitive dials to access the most needed functions. 8mp is probably a good compromise with a tiny sensor and Ricoh seem to have maximised that equation.

 

The GR-D will accompany my Leica CM on travel trips. I always feel happier with a film backup.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

M8 + M6 with a brick of film. If you're carrying the lenses, you need a body that lets you keep on using them and get the job done. Also it's so much easier to have two bodies if you need to shift from wide to long. And it's STILL hardly any more money than a 1Ds2 - and the 1Ds3 ain't there yet...

 

I ordered M8 #2 today. I've arrived at the point of believing all will be well.

 

Best

Chris, you are brave, but I am not far behind you. Waiting for my M8 to come back (hopefully in 2 weeks) and will go for a second one if no more reports of sudden death.

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...